Skip to content
AnalystLens

AMEREN CORP Annual Report, Year Ended Dec 31, 2009

Filing Date
Filed February 26, 2010
Period End
December 31, 2009
Security
AEE
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K155

AEE filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 155 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. FY2016 annual report10-K · Feb ’17Feb ’17
  2. Material agreement8-K · Aug ’19Aug ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Oct ’21Oct ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Dec ’25Dec ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-K filed February 26, 2010. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Ameren Corporation's 2009 10-K filing indicates a company navigating a challenging economic environment.

While net income remained relatively stable compared to 2008, earnings per share saw a slight decline due to factors like lower sales volumes in regulated businesses, reduced margins in merchant generation, and higher financing costs. The company focused on improving its liquidity position by extending credit facilities and reducing reliance on borrowings. Ameren's regulated utilities are actively engaged in rate cases with state regulators to recover significant investments in infrastructure and to address rising costs, aiming to achieve fair returns on invested capital.

The company's financial health is underpinned by its regulated utility segments, which provide a predictable source of cash flow. However, the merchant generation segment continues to be subject to market volatility.

Looking ahead, Ameren anticipates significant capital expenditures for environmental compliance, particularly for retrofitting coal-fired power plants, and ongoing investments in infrastructure reliability. The company's outlook is also influenced by evolving environmental regulations, including those related to greenhouse gas emissions, which could necessitate further capital investments and potentially impact operating costs.

Key Highlights

  1. Ameren reported net income of $612 million, or $2.78 per share, for 2009, a slight decrease from $605 million, or $2.88 per share, in 2008.
  2. The company's regulated utilities are seeking rate increases to recover investments in infrastructure and higher financing costs, with rate cases pending in Illinois and Missouri.
  3. Liquidity was strengthened in 2009, with available liquidity of approximately $1.9 billion at year-end, an increase from $1.3 billion at the end of 2008.
  4. Capital expenditures in 2009 totaled $1.7 billion, a reduction from $1.9 billion in 2008, reflecting efforts to defer or reduce spending due to economic conditions.
  5. Significant capital expenditures are planned for 2010-2014, including up to $8.1 billion for environmental compliance and infrastructure upgrades.
  6. Ameren continues to monitor and adapt to potential impacts from future environmental regulations, particularly those concerning greenhouse gas emissions.
  7. The Taum Sauk pumped-storage hydroelectric plant rebuild is nearing completion, with operations expected to resume in Q2 2010, contributing to increased margins.

Financial Statements

FY2009 against FY2008

Line itemFY2009FY2008Change
Revenue$7.13B$7.87B−9.3%
Operating Expenses$5.72B$6.51B−12.1%
Operating Income$1.42B$1.36B+4.0%
Interest Expense$508.00M$440.00M+15.5%
Net Income$612.00M$605.00M+1.2%
EPS (Basic)$2.78——
Shares Outstanding (Basic)220.40M210.10M+4.9%

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What were the main drivers of Ameren's financial performance in 2009?

    Ameren's 2009 financial performance was influenced by several factors, including milder weather conditions and a general economic slowdown which impacted sales volumes in its regulated businesses. The merchant generation segment faced reduced margins due to lower market prices. The company also made significant investments in infrastructure and faced higher financing costs. Rate cases in Illinois and Missouri were pursued to help recover these costs and investments.

  2. How is Ameren managing its liquidity in light of the challenging economic and credit market conditions?

    Ameren focused on strengthening its liquidity in 2008 and 2009. This included replacing and extending its credit facilities, reducing reliance on borrowings from these facilities, increasing cash balances, and improving the equity content of its capitalization. The company also reduced planned spending, headcount, and capital investments to mitigate the impact of the weak economy and lower power prices.

  3. What are Ameren's major capital expenditure plans for the coming years?

    Ameren plans significant capital expenditures between 2010 and 2014, estimated at $6.3 billion to $8.1 billion. These expenditures will be directed towards complying with environmental regulations (e.g., retrofitting coal-fired power plants with pollution control equipment), investing in electric and natural gas utility infrastructure to improve reliability, and upgrading power generation facilities. UE alone expects to spend up to $4.2 billion on infrastructure and environmental compliance.

  4. What is the company's outlook regarding environmental regulations, particularly greenhouse gas emissions?

    Ameren anticipates increased capital expenditures and operating costs due to evolving environmental regulations, including potential federal and state legislation to limit greenhouse gas emissions. While the exact impact is uncertain, these regulations could lead to higher costs, necessitate the closure of some coal-fired facilities, or result in asset impairments. The company is monitoring legislative developments closely and is already investing in pollution control equipment to comply with existing regulations.

  5. How are the regulated utility segments performing, and what are the key regulatory challenges?

    Ameren's regulated utilities, UE, CIPS, CILCO, and IP, are focused on improving their earnings to achieve fair returns on their investments, which have historically been below authorized levels due to regulatory lag. They are actively pursuing rate cases in Illinois and Missouri to recover investments in infrastructure, higher financing costs, and increasing fuel costs. The outcomes of these rate cases and the regulatory lag involved in getting new rates approved are critical to their financial performance.