8-KMaterial Agreements

AMGEN INC 8-K Report, Material Agreement (Mar 12, 2007)

Filed March 12, 2007For Securities:AMGN

Summary

Amgen Inc. (AMGN) filed an 8-K on March 12, 2007, reporting on actions taken by its Compensation and Management Development Committee (Compensation Committee) on March 6, 2007. The committee approved cash bonus awards for certain executives under the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) based on 2006 performance and established performance goals and target awards for 2007. The report details the specific payout amounts for named executive officers for 2006, which were less than their targeted awards due to the committee exercising its 'negative discretion.' For 2007, the Compensation Committee set "Adjusted Net Income" as the primary performance goal for EIP awards. Target awards for named executive officers were established as a percentage of this Adjusted Net Income, which is defined with specific adjustments for items like changes in accounting principles, amortization of acquired intangibles, and acquisition-related expenses. The company's intention is for these EIP awards to satisfy requirements for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Key Highlights

  • 1Amgen's Compensation Committee approved and authorized payouts for 2006 EIP awards to named executive officers, noting that actual payouts were below target due to negative discretion.
  • 2Specific 2006 EIP award amounts are disclosed for key executives, including Kevin Sharer ($4,525,000), Dennis Fenton ($1,295,000), George Morrow ($1,520,000), Richard Nanula ($1,240,000), and Roger Perlmutter ($1,445,000).
  • 3The Compensation Committee established "Adjusted Net Income" as the primary performance goal for the 2007 EIP awards.
  • 4Target awards for 2007 are set as a percentage of Adjusted Net Income for each named executive officer, with Kevin Sharer having a higher percentage (0.125%) compared to others (0.075%).
  • 5A specific definition for "Adjusted Net Income" for 2007 is provided, including adjustments for accounting changes, amortization of acquired intangibles, in-process R&D expenses, and severance costs related to acquisitions.
  • 6The company intends for EIP awards to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
  • 7The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to adjust awards downwards ('negative discretion') and considers various performance factors, including individual performance and broader company strategic goals.

Frequently Asked Questions