Skip to content
AnalystLens

Booking Holdings Inc. Annual Report (Amendment), Year Ended Dec 31, 2001

Filing Date
Filed November 5, 2003
Period End
December 31, 2001
Security
BKNG
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K145

BKNG filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 145 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · May ’16May ’16
  2. FY2018 annual report10-K · Feb ’19Feb ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Jun ’21Jun ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Sep ’25Sep ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-K/A filed November 5, 2003. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

This filing is an amendment to Booking Holdings Inc.'s (then priceline.com) 2001 Form 10-K, specifically addressing Part III, Item 13 concerning certain relationships and related party transactions.

The key focus is on the company's agreements with Worldspan, L.P., a global travel distribution system (GDS). Priceline.com relied exclusively on Worldspan for booking travel reservations. Notably, an initial agreement provided a 100%a discount on monthly fees contingent upon achieving a minimum booking volume.

Subsequent amendments introduced obligations for priceline.com to source a significant majority of its US and Canadian bookings through Worldspan, with failure potentially leading to termination and liquidated damages, alongside incentive payments for bookings generated by priceline.com. The filing emphasizes that these agreements were negotiated at arm's length.

Key Highlights

  1. The filing is an amendment to the 2001 10-K, specifically focusing on related party transactions, not a new financial report.
  2. Priceline.com's exclusive reliance on Worldspan, L.P. as its Global Distribution System (GDS) for travel bookings is a central theme.
  3. A significant discount on Worldspan's services was provided, contingent on meeting minimum booking thresholds.
  4. Amendments to the Worldspan agreement introduced booking volume commitments for priceline.com in the US and Canada, with potential penalties for non-compliance.
  5. The company disclosed potential liquidated damages up to $25 million and incentive payments related to booking targets with Worldspan.
  6. All agreements with Worldspan are stated to have been negotiated at arm's length.
  7. The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $671 million as of June 30, 2003.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the main purpose of this filing?

    This filing is an amendment to Booking Holdings Inc.'s (then priceline.com) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. It specifically amends information related to Part III, Item 13, which covers certain relationships and related party transactions.

  2. Who is Worldspan and what is the company's relationship with them?

    Worldspan, L.P. is a global travel distribution system (GDS) that served as priceline.com's sole provider for booking travel reservations for its customers. The filing details various agreements between priceline.com and Worldspan concerning the provision of hardware, software, and services.

  3. Were there any financial benefits or risks associated with the Worldspan agreements?

    Yes, there were both. Initially, priceline.com received a 100% discount on monthly fees from Worldspan, provided a minimum number of bookings were met. However, subsequent amendments imposed obligations to generate a minimum percentage of bookings through Worldspan in the US and Canada. Failure to comply could result in the termination of the agreement and liability for liquidated damages up to $25 million. Conversely, priceline.com was eligible for incentive payments based on booking volumes and targets.

  4. Was the relationship with Worldspan considered an arm's length transaction?

    Yes, the filing states that each of the Subscriber Entity Agreement and its amendments were negotiated at arm's length, meaning they were on commercially reasonable terms that priceline.com believes unrelated third parties would have also agreed to.