Skip to content
AnalystLens

BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO Annual Report, Year Ended Dec 31, 2017

Filing Date
Filed February 13, 2018
Period End
December 31, 2017
Securities
BMYCELG-RIBMYMP
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K169

BMY filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 169 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Deal closed8-K · Nov ’19Nov ’19
  2. Leadership change8-K · Aug ’21Aug ’21
  3. Leadership change8-K · Jul ’25Jul ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-K filed February 13, 2018. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Bristol-Myers Squibb's 2017 Form 10-K shows a company in transition: total revenues rose 7% to $20.8 billiona, driven by Opdivo ($4.9B, up 31%) and Eliquis ($4.9B, up 46%), which offset steep declines in established brands such as the Hepatitis C franchise (down 74%), Sustiva and Reyataz.

Prioritized brands made up roughly 75% of revenues. Reported GAAP diluted EPS fell to $0.61b from $2.65, largely because of a one-time $2.9 billion U.S. tax reform charge (the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act) and $1.1 billion in license and asset acquisition charges. Management's non-GAAP diluted EPS rose to $3.01 from $2.83, a 6% increase, which investors should read alongside the GAAP figure since the adjustments are large and recurring in nature.

The filing highlights a heavy dependence on immuno-oncology. Opdivo is the backbone of the IO franchise, and the company is running many late-stage trials, several of which carry readout risk. The 10-K also notes a Phase III CheckMate-227 result and a securities class action tied to CheckMate-026.

Eliquis has a U.S. composition-of-matter patent restored to November 2026 after twenty-five Paragraph IV challenges, with settlements reached with several filers, and the company is shifting toward biologics manufacturing with a new Irish facility expected in 2019. Liquidity remains solid, with $9.3 billionc in cash and marketable securities, a $5.0 billion revolving credit facility undrawn, and a credit rating of A2/A+/A-. The main investor debate centers on whether the Opdivo and Eliquis launches can offset the erosion of the legacy portfolio and absorb rising rebate and gross-to-net pressure.

GTN adjustments reached 24% of gross product sales, up from 21%, and the U.S. loss of exclusivity for Sustiva and Reyataz in December 2017 signals further declines ahead. The $2.5 billiond deemed repatriation tax, payable over eight years, adds a cash obligation that will weigh on flexibility over the coming years.

Key Highlights

  1. Total revenues grew 7% to $20.8 billion in 2017, with Opdivo (+31% to $4.9B) and Eliquis (+46% to $4.9B) as the primary growth drivers.
  2. GAAP diluted EPS fell to $0.61 from $2.65, mainly due to a $2.9B U.S. tax reform charge and $1.1B in license and asset acquisition charges; non-GAAP diluted EPS rose 6% to $3.01.
  3. Six prioritized brands represented roughly 75% of 2017 revenues, which highlights concentration risk in Opdivo, Eliquis, Orencia, Sprycel, Yervoy and Empliciti.
  4. Gross-to-net adjustments rose to 24% of gross product sales from 21% in 2016, reflecting Eliquis formulary competition and higher Medicaid and Medicare rebates.
  5. Operating cash flow more than doubled to $5.3 billion, helped by lower tax payments and $951 million in out-licensing and litigation settlement proceeds, including the Merck Keytruda settlement.
  6. Eliquis U.S. composition-of-matter patent term was extended to November 2026 after twenty-five Paragraph IV challenges, and several filers have settled, leaving the projected LOE unchanged.
  7. Ongoing cost restructuring included $826 million in 2017 charges and a plan to close R&D sites, while the company remains committed to R&D spending of $6.4 billion.

Financial Statements

FY2017 against FY2016

Line itemFY2017FY2016Change
Revenue$20.78B$19.43B+6.9%
Cost of Revenue$6.07B$4.95B+22.6%
Gross Profit$14.68B$14.48B+1.4%
R&D Expenses$6.47B$5.01B+29.1%
SG&A Expenses$4.75B$4.98B−4.6%
Operating Expenses$15.64B$13.51B+15.8%
Interest Expense$196.00M$167.00M+17.4%
Net Income$1.01B$4.46B−77.4%
EPS (Basic)$0.61$2.67−77.2%
EPS (Diluted)$0.61$2.65−77.0%
Shares Outstanding (Basic)1.65B1.67B−1.6%
Shares Outstanding (Diluted)1.65B1.68B−1.7%

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Why did GAAP EPS drop so sharply in 2017 even though revenue grew?

    GAAP diluted EPS fell to $0.61 from $2.65 primarily because of a one-time $2.9 billion tax charge tied to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, including a $2.6 billion deemed repatriation tax. Higher license and asset acquisition charges of $1.1 billion, which are expensed R&D payments for acquired compounds, also weighed on results. Excluding these specified items, management reports non-GAAP EPS of $3.01, up from $2.83.

  2. How dependent is BMS on Opdivo and Eliquis for future growth?

    Both products are central. Opdivo and Eliquis together generated about $9.8 billion in 2017, close to half of total revenues, and both grew more than 30%. The filing notes that Opdivo is the only single product to exceed 10% of R&D spending, which signals a concentration of both commercial and development resources in this franchise.

  3. What are the main near-term risks to revenue?

    Key risks include loss of exclusivity on established brands, such as the U.S. Sustiva and Reyataz LOE in December 2017 and the expiration of Hepatitis C competition. Pricing pressure is also rising, with GTN adjustments up to 24% of gross sales. In addition, Opdivo faces increasing competition from other IO agents, and several late-stage readouts in 2018 and 2019 carry clinical and regulatory uncertainty.

  4. How strong is the balance sheet and liquidity position?

    BMS held $9.3 billion in cash and marketable securities and $6.9 billion in long-term debt, leaving a net cash position of $1.3 billion, down from $2.4 billion a year earlier. It maintains $5.0 billion in undrawn revolving credit facilities and credit ratings of A2, A+ and A-. It repurchased $2.5 billion of stock in 2017, funded partly by $1.5 billion in new debt, and paid $2.6 billion in dividends.

  5. What should investors watch in the coming year?

    Investors should watch Opdivo label expansions and Phase III readouts such as CheckMate-227, the FDA action dates for Opdivo plus Yervoy in renal cell carcinoma, the Eliquis patent litigation outcomes, the GTN trend, the first-year impact of the tax reform cash payments, and progress on the Irish biologics facility, which is expected to be operational in 2019.