8-KLeadership Changes

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO INC /DE/ 8-K Report, Executive Changes (Feb 1, 2011)

Filed February 1, 2011For Securities:CHD

Summary

This Form 8-K filing from Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD), dated February 1, 2011, primarily details the approval of the annual incentive compensation plan criteria for executive officers for the fiscal year 2011, effective January 26, 2011. The plan outlines a structured approach to bonus payouts, linking compensation to both corporate and divisional performance, as well as individual contributions. This provides insight into how the company intends to motivate and reward its key personnel, aligning their interests with shareholder value creation through predefined financial and operational targets.

Key Highlights

  • 1The company's annual incentive plan criteria for 2011 executive compensation were approved on January 26, 2011.
  • 2Executive compensation is tied to a mix of corporate performance (60-100%) and divisional performance (0-40%).
  • 3Corporate performance metrics include consolidated net sales, gross margin, earnings per share (EPS), and free cash flow, each weighted equally at 25%.
  • 4Individual performance can reduce incentive compensation by up to 20% of the total target award.
  • 5Divisional performance metrics vary by division, focusing on metrics like net sales, gross margin, operating margin, EBIT, and working capital.
  • 6A numerical rating system (0 to 2.0) determines the payout amount, with specific ratings for minimum, target (1.0 rating equivalent to 1.2x salary), and maximum achievement levels.
  • 7Certain metrics are subject to adjustments for factors like foreign exchange fluctuations and acquisitions/divestitures.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main purpose of this 8-K filing is to announce the approval of the annual incentive compensation plan criteria for Church & Dwight's executive officers for the fiscal year 2011. This outlines how their bonuses will be determined.

Incentive compensation is based on a combination of corporate performance (60-100%) and divisional performance (0-40%), with a potential reduction of up to 20% based on individual performance. The exact split depends on whether the executive is primarily responsible for a division's performance.

Corporate performance is evaluated based on four equally weighted metrics: consolidated net sales, gross margin, earnings per share (EPS), and free cash flow (net cash from operations less capital expenditures).

Yes, the company has established minimum achievement levels below which no award will be paid, and maximum achievement levels at which the maximum award amount will be paid. The payout scale ranges from 0.0 for no award to 2.0 for maximum achievement.