8-KShareholder Matters

CME GROUP INC. 8-K Report, Shareholder Vote Results (May 28, 2013)

Filed May 28, 2013For Securities:CME

Summary

This Form 8-K from CME Group Inc. reports on the results of its 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which took place on May 21, 2013. The meeting saw a high turnout, with approximately 84% of Class A and Class B common stock shares present either in person or by proxy. Key outcomes include the overwhelming approval of nine Equity Directors, the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditor, and advisory approval of executive compensation. Notably, a shareholder proposal regarding proxy access did not receive sufficient support to pass. The filing also details the election of Class B Directors and Nominating Committee members, with some committee elections deferred. Overall, the meeting results indicate strong shareholder support for the company's board and financial oversight, while demonstrating a lack of consensus on the proxy access proposal.

Key Highlights

  • 1High shareholder participation with 84% of outstanding shares represented at the Annual Meeting.
  • 2All nine proposed Equity Directors were elected with substantial 'For' votes.
  • 3Ernst & Young LLP was ratified as the independent auditor for 2013 with broad shareholder approval.
  • 4Advisory vote on executive compensation was approved by a significant majority of shareholders.
  • 5A shareholder proposal for Proxy Access failed to gain sufficient support.
  • 6Election of specific Class B Directors and Nominating Committee members occurred, with some elections deferred.
  • 7The voting results indicate strong alignment between the company and its shareholders on governance and executive pay.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary purpose of this Form 8-K filing was to report the official results of CME Group Inc.'s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, detailing the outcomes of various proposals voted on by shareholders.

Yes, all nine proposed Equity Directors were overwhelmingly elected by the Class A and Class B shareholders, indicating strong support for the current board.

Yes, the compensation of the company's named executive officers was approved by an advisory vote from the shareholders, with a large majority voting in favor.

The shareholder proposal concerning Proxy Access did not receive sufficient support from the Class A and Class B shareholders to be approved.