Skip to content
AnalystLens

CenterPoint Energy Annual Report (Amendment), Year Ended Dec 31, 2004

Filing Date
Filed January 10, 2006
Period End
December 31, 2004
Security
CNP
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q348-K241

CNP filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 34 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 241 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · Apr ’18Apr ’18
  2. Deal closed8-K · Jun ’20Jun ’20
  3. Deal closed8-K · Jan ’22Jan ’22
  4. Material agreement8-K · Oct ’25Oct ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-K/A filed January 10, 2006. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC (CNP) presents a complex financial picture in its January 10, 2006 10-K filing.

The company incurred significant losses in 2004 due to an extraordinary loss related to the 2004 True-Up Proceeding and a substantial loss on the sale of its Texas Genco subsidiary. These events, combined with ongoing restructuring and regulatory proceedings, have impacted its financial performance and capital structure. However, the company is actively managing its liquidity through new credit facilities and has detailed plans for debt repayment and operational improvements across its core Electric Transmission & Distribution and Natural Gas Distribution segments.

Key Highlights

  1. Significant net loss of $905 million in 2004, largely driven by an extraordinary loss of $977 million related to the Texas True-Up Proceeding and a $366 million loss on the sale of Texas Genco.
  2. Proceeds of $2.931 billion are expected from the sale of Texas Genco, which will be used primarily to repay indebtedness.
  3. CenterPoint Houston secured approval to securitize approximately $1.8 billion of its true-up balance, with further recovery mechanisms being pursued.
  4. The company replaced its $750 million revolving credit facility with a $1 billion facility in March 2005, enhancing its liquidity.
  5. There was a material weakness identified in internal controls over financial reporting related to the elimination of interdivision natural gas purchases and sales, leading to a restatement of 2004 financial statements.
  6. The company is undertaking a 'quasi-reorganization' to eliminate its accumulated deficit of approximately $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2004.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What were the main drivers of the company's financial performance in 2004?

    The company's 2004 performance was significantly impacted by an extraordinary loss of $977 million related to the Texas Utility Commission's final order in the 2004 True-Up Proceeding, which required a write-down of regulatory assets. Additionally, a loss of $366 million was recorded on the sale of its Texas Genco subsidiary. These factors contributed to a net loss of $905 million for the year.

  2. How is CenterPoint Energy addressing its liquidity and debt obligations?

    CenterPoint Energy is actively managing its liquidity and debt. In March 2005, it replaced its $750 million revolving credit facility with a $1 billion facility. Furthermore, proceeds from the Texas Genco sale and securitization of the true-up balance are earmarked for debt repayment. The company anticipates its credit facilities and cash flows will be sufficient to meet its 2005 cash needs.

  3. What is the significance of the Texas True-Up Proceeding and its impact?

    The Texas True-Up Proceeding related to the recovery of certain costs incurred during the transition to a competitive retail electric market in Texas. The Texas Utility Commission authorized a recovery of $2.3 billion, but this was less than initially sought. The company recorded a significant extraordinary loss due to write-downs of regulatory assets based on this order, and is appealing certain aspects of the commission's decision.

  4. What is the 'quasi-reorganization' mentioned in the filing, and why is it being undertaken?

    A quasi-reorganization is an accounting procedure to eliminate an accumulated deficit. CenterPoint Energy had an accumulated deficit of $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2004, stemming from past events including the RRI distribution, the extraordinary loss on the true-up proceeding, and the loss on the Texas Genco sale. This reorganization aims to provide a 'fresh start' and is also important for complying with SEC regulations under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, which restrict dividend payments when retained earnings are insufficient.