10-QPeriod: Q2 FY2013

Duke Energy CORP Quarterly Report for Q2 Ended Jun 30, 2013

Filed August 8, 2013For Securities:DUKDUKBDUK-PA

Summary

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) reported its second quarter 2013 financial results, showing a mixed performance impacted by the recent merger with Progress Energy and operational factors. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, consolidated net income attributable to Duke Energy Corporation was $339 million, or $0.48 per diluted share, a decrease from $444 million, or $0.99 per diluted share, in the prior year's quarter. This decline was significantly influenced by a $180 million impairment charge related to Duke Energy Florida's Crystal River Unit 3 retirement and Levy investments, as well as lower contributions from non-regulated businesses and less favorable weather conditions. However, the inclusion of Progress Energy's results since July 2012 contributed positively to revenue and operational scale, partially offsetting these headwinds. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, net income attributable to Duke Energy Corporation was $973 million, or $1.37 per diluted share, compared to $739 million, or $1.65 per diluted share, for the same period in 2012. The year-to-date performance reflects the integration of Progress Energy and favorable weather impacts, which were counteracted by significant impairment charges, higher merger integration costs, and lower results in international operations. The company's capital expenditures remain substantial as it invests in fleet modernization and infrastructure, supported by strong operating cash flows.

Financial Statements
Beta
Revenue$5.39B
Operating Expenses$5.06B
Operating Income$742.00M
Interest Expense$381.00M
Net Income$339.00M
EPS (Basic)$0.48
EPS (Diluted)$0.48
Shares Outstanding (Basic)706.00M
Shares Outstanding (Diluted)706.00M

Key Highlights

  • 1Consolidated net income attributable to Duke Energy Corporation decreased to $339 million ($0.48/share) for Q2 2013 from $444 million ($0.99/share) in Q2 2012.
  • 2A significant impairment charge of $180 million (after-tax) related to Crystal River Unit 3 and Levy investments impacted the USFE&G segment and overall earnings.
  • 3Operating revenues increased significantly year-over-year due to the inclusion of Progress Energy's results following the merger completion in July 2012.
  • 4Operating cash flow for the first six months of 2013 was robust at $2.84 billion, an increase from $2.00 billion in the prior year period, supporting ongoing capital investments.
  • 5Capital expenditures for the first six months of 2013 were $2.72 billion, up from $2.25 billion in the prior year, reflecting continued investment in the business.
  • 6The company highlighted regulatory developments, including proposed rate increases in North Carolina and South Carolina, and ongoing reviews by the FPSC concerning Crystal River Unit 3 and Levy projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

The decline in net income was primarily due to a significant $180 million after-tax impairment charge related to Duke Energy Florida's Crystal River Unit 3 retirement and Levy investments. Additionally, lower contributions from non-regulated businesses and less favorable weather conditions compared to the prior year also contributed to the decrease.

The merger with Progress Energy, completed in July 2012, had a significant impact. The inclusion of Progress Energy's results beginning in July 2012 contributed positively to consolidated operating revenues and scale. However, the merger also resulted in increased merger integration costs and a higher share count, which impacted diluted earnings per share.

Duke Energy continues to make substantial capital investments, with expenditures for the first six months of 2013 totaling $2.72 billion, up from $2.25 billion in the prior year. These investments are primarily directed towards fleet modernization, infrastructure upgrades, and environmental compliance. The company's liquidity is supported by strong operating cash flows, access to a $6 billion master credit facility, and the ability to access capital markets for debt and equity.

Yes, Duke Energy is navigating several key regulatory matters. These include ongoing reviews by the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) concerning the retirement of Crystal River Unit 3 and the Levy Nuclear Station project, with potential settlement agreements being reviewed. Additionally, rate case settlements are pending approval in North Carolina and South Carolina, which could impact future revenues.