Skip to content
AnalystLens

ECOLAB INC. Quarterly Report for Q1 Ended Mar 31, 2002

Filing Date
Filed May 7, 2002
Period End
March 31, 2002
Security
ECL
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K144

ECL filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 144 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · Sep ’16Sep ’16
  2. Leadership change8-K · Apr ’19Apr ’19
  3. Deal closed8-K · Dec ’21Dec ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Aug ’25Aug ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-Q filed May 7, 2002. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Ecolab Inc. reported net sales of $786.1 milliona for the first quarter ended March 31, 2002, a significant increase of 38% compared to $571.4 million in the prior year period.

This growth was primarily driven by the full consolidation of the Henkel-Ecolab joint venture, which became effective at the beginning of 2002. Excluding acquisitions, consolidated net sales saw a more modest increase of 2%. The company also incurred significant restructuring charges and special expenses totaling $23.3 millionb related to integrating European operations, impacting reported net income.

Despite the revenue increase, net income decreased by 12% to $38.9 millionc ($0.30 per diluted share) from $44.4 million ($0.34 per diluted share) in the prior year. This decline is attributed to the aforementioned restructuring charges, a gain from discontinued operations, and higher net interest expense resulting from debt used to finance the Henkel-Ecolab acquisition. The company is actively managing its debt levels and anticipates substantial cost savings from its restructuring initiatives in the coming years.

Key Highlights

  1. Net sales increased by 38% to $786.1 million, largely due to the consolidation of Henkel-Ecolab.
  2. Reported net income decreased by 12% to $38.9 million, impacted by significant restructuring charges.
  3. The company incurred $23.3 million in restructuring expenses and special charges related to European integration.
  4. Diluted earnings per share declined to $0.30 from $0.34 in the prior year.
  5. Operating cash flow saw a substantial increase of 61% to $86.8 million.
  6. The company issued €300 million in Eurobonds to repay commercial paper, demonstrating active debt management.
  7. Two strategic acquisitions were completed in January 2002: Kleencare Hygiene operations in Europe and Audits International (Ecosure) in the US.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What was the primary driver of the significant increase in net sales for the first quarter of 2002?

    The primary driver of the 38% increase in net sales to $786.1 million was the full consolidation of the Henkel-Ecolab joint venture, which became wholly-owned by Ecolab at the end of 2001 and its results were fully incorporated into the financial statements starting in the first quarter of 2002.

  2. Why did net income decrease despite the strong sales growth?

    Net income decreased by 12% to $38.9 million due to several factors, including $23.3 million in restructuring expenses and special charges related to the integration of European operations, higher net interest expense resulting from increased borrowings for the Henkel-Ecolab acquisition, and a gain from discontinued operations.

  3. What are the expected benefits of the announced restructuring and cost-saving actions?

    Ecolab anticipates that its restructuring initiatives, which include workforce reductions, facility closures, and product line discontinuances, will result in annual pretax savings of $25 million to $30 million. These savings are expected to begin in 2002 and have a full impact in 2003 and subsequent years.

  4. How did the adoption of SFAS No. 142 affect the financial results?

    The adoption of SFAS No. 142, which discontinued the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, increased net income by approximately $7.2 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, in the first quarter of 2002. This change also impacted the effective income tax rate and made year-over-year comparisons of operating income require careful consideration of prior period amortization.