Skip to content
AnalystLens

Consolidated Edison 8-K Report, Shareholder Vote Results (May 20, 2026)

Reports
Shareholder Matters
Filing Date
Filed May 20, 2026
Period End
May 18, 2026
Security
ED
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q338-K143

ED filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 33 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 143 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · May ’19May ’19
  2. Material agreement8-K · Jun ’21Jun ’21
  3. Leadership change8-K · Aug ’25Aug ’25

Summary

Summary of the 8-K filed May 20, 2026. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

This 8-K filing reports on the outcomes of Consolidated Edison, Inc.'s (Con Edison) Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 18, 2026.

The primary focus is on the voting results for the election of directors, the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditor, and an advisory vote on executive compensation. All proposals presented to shareholders received strong support, indicating continued confidence in the company's leadership and financial oversight.

Key Highlights

  1. All incumbent directors were re-elected with a significant majority of votes cast in favor.
  2. The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Con Edison's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026 was overwhelmingly ratified by stockholders.
  3. Stockholders provided an advisory approval of the compensation of Con Edison's named executive officers, with a substantial majority voting in favor.
  4. A notable number of broker non-votes were recorded for the executive compensation proposal, which is common in advisory 'say-on-pay' votes.
  5. The filing confirms the company's adherence to good corporate governance practices by presenting these key matters to its shareholders for a vote.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What were the main outcomes of Con Edison's Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 18, 2026?

    The main outcomes were the re-election of all directors, the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditor for 2026, and an advisory approval of named executive officer compensation.

  2. Did any directors fail to be re-elected?

    No, all directors presented for re-election received a substantial majority of votes in favor, indicating shareholder confidence in the current board composition.

  3. What is the significance of the broker non-votes reported for the executive compensation proposal?

    Broker non-votes occur when a broker holding shares in 'street name' for a beneficial owner does not have discretionary voting power for a particular proposal and has not received voting instructions from the owner. For advisory 'say-on-pay' votes, these non-votes are not counted towards the total votes cast on the proposal, but their presence reflects a portion of the shares eligible to vote that did not have an explicit instruction for or against executive compensation.

  4. Is the ratification of the independent auditor important for investors?

    Yes, the ratification of the independent auditor is important as it signifies shareholder confidence in the integrity and independence of the company's financial reporting and audit process. A strong ratification suggests that investors trust the oversight provided by the audit committee and the external auditors.