Skip to content
AnalystLens

Eversource Energy Annual Report (Amendment), Year Ended Dec 31, 1996

Filing Date
Filed June 12, 1998
Period End
December 31, 1996
Security
ES
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q338-K126

ES filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 33 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 126 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. FY2016 annual report10-K · Feb ’17Feb ’17
  2. Impairment8-K · Jul ’19Jul ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · May ’21May ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Dec ’25Dec ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-K/A filed June 12, 1998. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

This filing is not a standard annual report but Amendment No. 1 (Form 10-K/A) to the fiscal 1996 Form 10-K, submitted June 11, 1998 jointly by Northeast Utilities (NU, ticker ES in the request), The Connecticut Light and Power Company (CL&P), Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH), and Western Massachusetts Electric Company (WMECO).

Its purpose is to restate accounting for nuclear compliance costs after an SEC inquiry dated March 25, 1998. The SEC's position is that unavoidable incremental costs of current nuclear outages, and procedures required before reactor restart under NRC requirements, should be expensed as incurred rather than reserved in advance. NU and its auditor Arthur Andersen LLP had believed the prior accounting complied with GAAP, but the company agreed to adjust its accounting and amend its 1996 and 1997 Form 10-K filings.

For investors, the key point is that this amendment does not contain new financial statements in the document itself. Items 6, 7, 8 and 14 (selected financial data, MD&A, financial statements, and exhibits) are incorporated by reference from the amended 1997 Form 10-K/As, which reflect the restated accounting. The restatement changes the timing of expense recognition for nuclear outage costs, shifting them from prior reserve-based accruals toward expensing as incurred, which can affect reported earnings in the periods involved.

The excerpt provided does not quantify the dollar impact, so investors should consult the referenced 1997 amended filings for the specific effects on earnings, reserves, and balance sheet figures. The filing also provides useful context on the capital structure and market profile of the registrants. As of May 29, 1998, 136,886,368 NU common shares were outstanding, with a non-affiliate market value of approximately $2.18 billiona at a closing price of $15.94 per share.

NU holds all common stock of CL&P, PSNH and WMECO. CL&P has multiple preferred stock series listed on the NYSE, including 9.3%b Cumulative Monthly Income Preferred Securities issued through CL&P Capital, L.P. The main investor concern arising from this filing is the regulatory and accounting scrutiny of nuclear operations and the resulting earnings restatement, which may signal governance and reporting-quality risk.

Key Highlights

  1. Filing type: Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, submitted June 11, 1998 by NU, CL&P, PSNH and WMECO.
  2. Trigger: SEC letter dated March 25, 1998 questioning NU system accounting for nuclear compliance costs.
  3. Accounting change: SEC view that unavoidable incremental costs of nuclear outages and NRC-required pre-restart procedures should be expensed as incurred, not reserved in advance; NU agreed to adjust and amend its 1996 and 1997 Form 10-Ks.
  4. Auditor position: NU and Arthur Andersen LLP believed the original accounting complied with GAAP, but the company accepted the SEC's requested adjustment.
  5. Incorporation by reference: Items 6, 7, 8 and 14 are incorporated from the amended 1997 Form 10-K/As, so the restated financials are not contained in this document.
  6. Market data: 136,886,368 NU common shares outstanding as of May 29, 1998; non-affiliate market value about $2.18 billion at $15.94 per share.
  7. Capital structure: NU owns 100% of CL&P, PSNH and WMECO common stock; CL&P preferred securities are listed on the NYSE.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Why was this 10-K/A filed?

    The SEC, in a letter dated March 25, 1998, challenged NU's accounting for nuclear compliance costs. The SEC required these unavoidable outage and pre-restart costs to be expensed as incurred, so NU agreed to amend its 1996 and 1997 Form 10-K filings to reflect that treatment.

  2. Does this filing contain restated financial statements?

    Not directly. Items 6 (Selected Financial Data), 7 (MD&A), 8 (Financial Statements) and 14 (Exhibits) are incorporated by reference from the amended 1997 Form 10-K/As, which reflect the change in accounting. Investors need those filings for the restated numbers.

  3. What is the financial impact of the accounting change?

    The excerpt does not quantify the impact. It states that costs previously reserved in advance will now be expensed as incurred, which shifts timing of expense recognition. The specific effect on earnings and reserves should be taken from the amended 1997 filings.

  4. Did the company admit its prior accounting was wrong?

    No. NU and its auditor Arthur Andersen LLP stated they believed the accounting was required by and complied with GAAP. The company agreed to adjust its accounting in response to the SEC's view, without conceding an error.

  5. What is the market size and share structure of Northeast Utilities?

    As of May 29, 1998, NU had 136,886,368 common shares outstanding. Non-affiliate market value was about $2.18 billion at $15.94 per share. NU holds all common stock of CL&P, PSNH and WMECO.