10-QPeriod: Q1 FY2007

EXELON CORP Quarterly Report for Q1 Ended Mar 31, 2007

Filed April 25, 2007For Securities:EXC

Summary

Exelon Corporation reported a significant increase in net income for the first quarter of 2007, reaching $691 million, a substantial jump from $400 million in the same period of 2006. This growth was driven by improved margins in Generation's wholesale sales following the expiration of a below-market power purchase agreement with ComEd, higher nuclear output, and lower nuclear refueling costs. Favorable weather conditions and increased delivery volumes also contributed positively across the ComEd and PECO segments. However, investors should note ongoing regulatory uncertainties, particularly in Illinois, where proposed legislation could lead to rate rollbacks for ComEd, posing potential adverse consequences including bankruptcy. The company also faces challenges related to rising operating expenses, including wage inflation, and increased depreciation and amortization. Despite these headwinds, Exelon met its capital requirements through internal cash flow and external financing, with ComEd and PECO issuing new bonds during the quarter. The company's outlook remains subject to regulatory actions and market price fluctuations, especially for Generation's unhedged electricity portfolio.

Key Highlights

  • 1Net income surged by 72.75% to $691 million in Q1 2007, up from $400 million in Q1 2006, driven by strong performance in the Generation segment.
  • 2Generation segment's net income more than doubled to $560 million, primarily due to higher wholesale market margins after the ComEd PPA expiration and increased nuclear output.
  • 3ComEd's net income significantly decreased by 90.74% to $5 million from $54 million, impacted by higher purchased power expenses and the end of transition revenues.
  • 4PECO's net income increased by 37.63% to $128 million, supported by higher operating revenues from rate increases and favorable weather.
  • 5ComEd experienced credit rating downgrades from Fitch and Moody's due to regulatory and political uncertainty in Illinois, impacting its access to commercial paper.
  • 6Exelon is exploring the potential construction of a new nuclear plant in Texas, having initiated the application process with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
  • 7The company faces potential regulatory headwinds, particularly in Illinois, with proposed legislation to roll back and freeze ComEd's rates, carrying a risk of material adverse consequences, including potential bankruptcy for ComEd.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary drivers were higher average margins from Generation's wholesale market sales due to the expiration of a below-market power purchase agreement with ComEd, increased nuclear output at Generation, decreased nuclear refueling outage costs, and favorable weather conditions impacting ComEd and PECO's service territories. Increased delivery volumes and transmission revenues at ComEd also contributed.

A significant risk is the potential for adverse legislative or regulatory action in Illinois to roll back or freeze ComEd's electricity rates. This could lead to material adverse consequences for ComEd, including the possibility of bankruptcy, which would in turn have adverse consequences for Exelon and Generation. Additionally, Exelon faces rising operating and maintenance expenses and increased depreciation and amortization.

ComEd's net income saw a substantial decline, falling from $54 million in Q1 2006 to $5 million in Q1 2007. This was mainly due to higher purchased power and fuel expenses, increased operating and maintenance costs, and higher depreciation and amortization. The end of regulatory transition periods and associated revenues also impacted results negatively.

Exelon, primarily through its Generation segment, aims to mitigate commodity price risk by entering into derivative contracts (forwards, futures, swaps, and options) with approved counterparties to hedge anticipated exposures. Generation has hedged a significant portion of its electricity portfolio for 2007 and 2008, but faces greater risk in subsequent years. They also use long-term contracts and financial instruments to manage price volatility for fuels like coal and natural gas.