8-KOther Events

EXELON CORP 8-K Report, Corporate Update (Apr 3, 2009)

Filed April 3, 2009For Securities:EXC

Summary

Exelon Corporation (EXC) announced a significant change in its executive compensation practices through an 8-K filing on April 3, 2009. The company has decided to eliminate excise tax gross-up payment provisions from all future employment agreements, as well as any material amendments to existing agreements, for its named executive officers. This policy change reflects a review of its compensation practices and aims to align executive compensation more closely with market norms and shareholder expectations regarding tax gross-ups. Investors should note that this change applies only to new agreements and material amendments, and does not affect existing agreements that may still contain such provisions.

Key Highlights

  • 1Exelon Corporation is discontinuing excise tax gross-up payments for named executive officers.
  • 2This change applies to new employment and change in control employment agreements.
  • 3The policy also extends to material amendments of existing executive employment agreements.
  • 4The decision follows a review of the company's executive compensation practices.
  • 5This action signals a move towards aligning executive compensation with market standards and shareholder interests.

Frequently Asked Questions

An excise tax gross-up payment is an additional amount paid to an executive by the company to cover any excise taxes that may be imposed on certain payments to the executive, such as those related to a change in control. Essentially, the company pays the tax so the executive receives the full intended payment.

The change announced by Exelon applies only to new employment or change in control employment agreements and material amendments to existing agreements. Existing agreements that already contain excise tax gross-up provisions will not be affected by this new policy unless they are materially amended.

Exelon stated that this decision is a result of a review of its executive compensation practices. The move suggests a desire to conform to evolving market practices and potentially respond to investor sentiment regarding executive pay and the cost of such gross-ups to the company.

The direct financial impact from eliminating future gross-up payments is likely to be minimal in the short term, as these provisions are typically triggered by specific events like change-in-control scenarios. However, it demonstrates a commitment to prudent cost management and aligning executive compensation structures, which could be viewed positively by investors.