Summary
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) in its 2013 10-K filing presented a company heavily invested in the development of its Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project and the Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project. The company has secured significant long-term contracts with major energy companies for its liquefaction capacity, providing a strong revenue foundation. Construction for the initial trains at Sabine Pass was progressing ahead of schedule, with commercial operations anticipated by late 2015. While the company has substantial debt obligations to finance its capital-intensive projects, its strategy relies on securing these long-term contracts and achieving project completion to generate stable, fee-based cash flows.
Financial Highlights
51 data pointsBeta
Financial Statements
Beta
| Revenue | $267.21M |
| R&D Expenses | $60.93M |
| Operating Expenses | $595.54M |
| Operating Income | -$328.33M |
| Interest Expense | $178.40M |
| Net Income | -$507.92M |
| EPS (Basic) | $-2.32 |
| Shares Outstanding (Basic) | 218.87M |
Key Highlights
- 1Cheniere is actively constructing up to six liquefaction trains at its Sabine Pass LNG terminal in Louisiana, with Trains 1-4 having received FERC authorization. Construction for Trains 1-4 was ahead of schedule as of year-end 2013, with Train 1 expected to commence LNG production by late 2015.
- 2The company has secured significant long-term Sale and Purchase Agreements (SPAs) for its liquefaction capacity from major customers like BG, Gas Natural Fenosa, KOGAS, GAIL, Total, and Centrica, with aggregate annual fixed fees estimated at $2.3 billion for Trains 1-4.
- 3Cheniere is also developing the Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project in Texas, designed for up to three trains with an aggregate capacity of approximately 13.5 mtpa, and has secured an SPA with PT Pertamina (Persero).
- 4The company has a substantial debt load, with over $6.5 billion in long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2013, primarily to finance the construction of its liquefaction projects.
- 5Cheniere has never paid a cash dividend and intends to retain earnings for business growth and development.
- 6The company is subject to extensive governmental regulation, requiring numerous permits and authorizations for its LNG terminal and pipeline operations.
- 7Cheniere reported a net loss of $507.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, reflecting significant ongoing investment in construction and development activities.
Frequently Asked Questions
Cheniere Energy's primary business is in LNG-related activities, focusing on developing, constructing, and operating LNG terminal and liquefaction facilities. The company's key development projects are the Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project in Louisiana, which involves constructing multiple liquefaction trains, and the Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project in Texas.
As of December 31, 2013, construction for Trains 1 and 2 at Sabine Pass was approximately 54% complete, and Trains 3 and 4 were approximately 20% complete, both ahead of schedule. Cheniere anticipated that Train 1 would commence LNG production as early as late 2015, with Trains 2, 3, and 4 expected to start operations on a staggered basis thereafter. The Corpus Christi project was in the development and EPC contracting phase.
Cheniere is financing its capital-intensive projects through a combination of significant debt issuances, including senior secured notes and credit facilities, and equity financing. As of December 31, 2013, the company had over $6.5 billion in long-term debt. The company also completed an initial public offering for Cheniere Holdings in December 2013, raising capital for development.
Key risks highlighted include significant debt levels and the ability to access capital markets, the potential for construction cost overruns and delays, reliance on customer performance under long-term contracts, operational risks at its facilities, regulatory approvals, competition, and the potential impact of market factors on LNG and natural gas prices and demand. The company also noted it had not been profitable historically and had negative operating cash flow.