10-QPeriod: Q2 FY2001

Mondelez International, Inc. Quarterly Report for Q2 Ended Jun 30, 2001

Filed August 13, 2001For Securities:MDLZ

Summary

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ), previously Kraft Foods Inc., reported its financial results for the quarter and six months ending June 30, 2001. The company underwent a significant transformation during this period, highlighted by its Initial Public Offering (IPO) on June 13, 2001, which raised $8.4 billion and was used to pay down debt to its former parent, Philip Morris. This IPO marked the company's transition to a publicly traded entity, with Philip Morris retaining a majority stake but no longer being the sole owner. The acquisition of Nabisco Holdings Corp. in December 2000 continued to significantly impact reported results, contributing substantially to revenue and volume growth in the current periods. While reported figures show increased revenues and operating companies income due to Nabisco, pro forma comparisons (which assume Nabisco was acquired earlier) indicate a more modest, or even slightly negative, growth in revenues, primarily due to currency headwinds and lower pricing in certain categories like coffee. Investors should note the significant impact of integration and debt reduction following the Nabisco acquisition and the successful completion of the IPO.

Key Highlights

  • 1Completed an Initial Public Offering (IPO) on June 13, 2001, raising $8.4 billion and becoming a publicly traded company, though Philip Morris remains the majority shareholder.
  • 2Acquisition of Nabisco significantly boosted reported operating revenues and volume, with reported revenues increasing by 27.0% and volume by 32.8% for the six-month period compared to the prior year.
  • 3Pro forma operating revenues showed a slight decrease of 0.03% for the six-month period, indicating that organic growth was challenged by currency headwinds and lower pricing, despite an increase in volume.
  • 4Interest and other debt expense, net, surged by $674 million for the six-month period, primarily due to debt incurred for the Nabisco acquisition.
  • 5The company reported a decrease in net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2001, to $831 million from $1,038 million in the prior year, largely attributed to higher goodwill amortization and interest expense from the Nabisco acquisition.
  • 6Pro forma net earnings, however, showed an increase of 11.6% for the six-month period, reaching $1,014 million, suggesting underlying operational improvements when normalized for acquisition timing.
  • 7The company is undergoing integration of Nabisco operations, which may include facility closures, with estimated charges between $200 million to $300 million expected over the next twelve months.

Frequently Asked Questions

The acquisition of Nabisco, completed in December 2000, significantly impacted reported financial results. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, reported operating revenues increased by 27.0% and reported volume by 32.8% compared to the prior year, largely driven by the consolidation of Nabisco's operations. However, the acquisition also led to increased goodwill amortization and interest expenses, which negatively affected reported net earnings.

The company used $8.4 billion in net proceeds from its June 2001 IPO to pay down a portion of the $11.0 billion long-term note payable to Philip Morris, which was incurred in connection with the Nabisco acquisition. This significantly reduced the company's total debt, lowering the debt-to-equity ratio from 1.84 at December 31, 2000, to 0.75 at June 30, 2001.

While reported net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2001, declined compared to the prior year, this was primarily due to non-operational factors like increased goodwill amortization and interest expense related to the Nabisco acquisition. On a pro forma basis, which adjusts for the timing of the Nabisco acquisition and IPO, net earnings actually increased by 11.6%. The company is also focused on integrating Nabisco, which may incur restructuring charges but is expected to yield cost savings and long-term growth. The effective tax rate also increased due to non-deductible goodwill amortization.

The company is involved in several legal proceedings, including antitrust claims related to dairy farmers and environmental matters. While management believes the final outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the company's financial position or results of operations, specific environmental matters at former Nabisco facilities in Ohio and Missouri, as well as pesticide contamination claims in Hawaii, are ongoing. The company has entered into an indemnification agreement for the Hawaii matters.