Skip to content
AnalystLens

Monster Beverage 8-K Report, Financial Results (May 7, 2026)

Reports
Earnings & Results·Regulation FD·Exhibits & Filings
Filing Date
Filed May 7, 2026
Period End
May 7, 2026
Security
MNST
In the record · 2016–202610-K1210-Q328-K97

MNST filed 12 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 97 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · Mar ’18Mar ’18
  2. Leadership change8-K · Mar ’21Mar ’21
  3. Leadership change8-K · Apr ’25Apr ’25

Summary

Summary of the 8-K filed May 7, 2026. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Monster Beverage (MNST) reported a strong first quarter 2026 (quarter ended March 31, 2026).

Net sales rose 26.9% year over year to $2.35 billiona, a first-quarter record that crossed $2.0 billion for the first time in the company's history. Excluding a 4-point foreign currency tailwind of $89.3 million, net sales grew 22.1% on an FX-neutral basis. Operating income increased 28.1% to $730.0 million, and diluted EPS rose 27.6% to $0.58.

Non-GAAP adjusted operating income grew 24.1% to $733.5 millionb, and adjusted EPS grew 23.7% to $0.58. International sales were a major driver, up 44.9% to $1.06 billion and about 45% of total net sales, the highest share of any quarter in company history. Margins were mixed.

Gross margin compressed about 150 basis points to 55.0% (55.3% adjusted, excluding alcohol), reflecting geographic sales mix, higher aluminum can costs, and higher freight-in costs tied to out-of-orbit production driven by strong demand, partly offset by pricing. Operating expense leverage was favorable: operating expenses fell to 23.9% of sales from 25.8%, with selling and G&A both declining as a percentage of sales. The Monster Energy Drinks segment grew 27.6% to $2.19 billionc, while Strategic Brands (Coca-Cola-acquired brands, Predator, and Fury) rose 28.9% to $126.7 million.

Alcohol Brands declined 5.9%. Energy drink case sales rose roughly 29% to 274.5 million 192-ounce equivalents, while average net sales per case slipped to $8.44d from $8.51. Capital allocation remained active: the company repurchased about 1.4 million shares for roughly $100.0 million at an average price of $73.86, leaving about $400.0 million under the existing authorization.

Cash and short-term investments totaled about $2.98 billion, and total investments (current and noncurrent) grew materially. Accounts receivable rose sharply to $1.88 billion, which is worth monitoring alongside the strong top-line growth.

The accompanying scanner data (NielsenIQ, primarily U.S. measured channels through late April 2026) showed U.S. Monster dollar sales down 18.7% year over year in the 13 weeks reported, a meaningful divergence from reported growth that investors should examine on the earnings call. Reported results are not audited, and the full financials will be filed in the Form 10-Q.

Key Highlights

  1. Net sales up 26.9% to $2.35 billion (22.1% FX-neutral); first fiscal Q1 above $2.0 billion in company history
  2. Operating income up 28.1% to $730.0 million; adjusted operating income up 24.1% to $733.5 million
  3. Diluted EPS up 27.6% to $0.58; adjusted diluted EPS up 23.7% to $0.58
  4. International net sales up 44.9% to $1.06 billion, about 45% of total sales, a company record for a single quarter
  5. Gross margin fell to 55.0% from 56.5% due to geographic mix, aluminum and freight-in costs, partly offset by pricing
  6. Operating expenses improved to 23.9% of net sales from 25.8%, supporting margin expansion at the operating line
  7. Repurchased about $100.0 million of stock (1.4 million shares at $73.86); about $400.0 million remains authorized

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What drove Monster's strong first-quarter 2026 growth?

    Growth was broad-based across segments and geographies. The Monster Energy Drinks segment rose 27.6% to $2.19 billion, with international markets up 44.9% (32.7% FX-neutral). Energy drink case volume rose roughly 29% to 274.5 million 192-ounce equivalents, though average net sales per case declined slightly to $8.44 from $8.51, indicating volume gains came partly at lower average pricing or mix.

  2. Why did gross margin decline even as sales grew strongly?

    Management attributed the 150 basis point decline in gross margin to geographic sales mix (with more lower-margin international sales), higher aluminum can costs, and higher freight-in costs from out-of-orbit production needed to meet demand. Pricing actions partly offset these pressures. Adjusted gross margin excluding alcohol was 55.3% versus 57.1% a year earlier.

  3. Are the scanner data in Exhibit 99.2 consistent with the reported results?

    Not clearly. The NielsenIQ data show U.S. Monster dollar sales down 18.7% year over year in the 13 weeks ended late April 2026, and Monster's U.S. convenience and gas dollar share fell 0.5 points, while Reign and Bang also declined. Reported results are driven by global sales, including strong international growth, and shipments to distributors do not necessarily match retail sell-through. Investors should ask management on the call how U.S. retail trends reconcile with reported U.S. performance and what drives the gap.

  4. How is Monster returning capital to shareholders?

    In the first quarter, Monster repurchased about 1.4 million shares for approximately $100.0 million at an average price of $73.86. As of May 6, 2026, roughly $400.0 million remained under the existing repurchase authorization. Diluted share count rose modestly to 988.3 million from 981.3 million, so buybacks have not yet offset dilution from equity compensation.

  5. What should investors watch in the upcoming 10-Q and earnings call?

    Key items include the cause of the gross margin decline and its trajectory, the sustainability of international growth and currency effects, the sharp increase in accounts receivable to $1.88 billion from $1.62 billion at year-end (which may reflect timing of shipments), the rise in income taxes payable, and the U.S. retail trends in the scanner data. Management's commentary on the Alcohol Brands segment and on regulatory risks affecting energy drinks, such as SNAP restrictions and sugar-related rules, would also be informative.