8-KShareholder MattersCorporate ChangesExhibits & Filings

Marathon Petroleum Corp 8-K Report, Bylaw Amendment (May 1, 2018)

Filed May 1, 2018For Securities:MPC

Summary

Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) filed an 8-K on May 1, 2018, primarily detailing the outcomes of its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 25, 2018. The most significant corporate governance development reported is the stockholder approval to amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirement for bylaw amendments. This change, effective upon filing the certificate of amendment on May 1, 2018, simplifies the process for future bylaw modifications. The filing also provides detailed voting results for various proposals, including the election of Class I directors, ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditor, and advisory votes on executive compensation. Notably, a shareholder proposal to adopt an alternative shareholder right to call a special meeting did not pass. The company will continue to hold an annual advisory vote on executive compensation as determined by the board.

Key Highlights

  • 1Stockholders approved an amendment to eliminate the supermajority voting requirement for bylaw amendments, simplifying future governance changes.
  • 2The company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws were updated to reflect this change.
  • 3Abdulaziz F. Alkhayyal, Donna A. James, and James E. Rohr were elected as Class I directors.
  • 4PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was ratified as the independent auditor for 2018.
  • 5An advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation was passed by stockholders.
  • 6The company will hold an annual advisory vote on executive compensation.
  • 7A shareholder proposal for an alternative right to call a special meeting did not pass.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary corporate governance change approved was the elimination of the supermajority voting requirement for bylaw amendments. This means that future amendments to the company's bylaws will require a simpler majority vote rather than a higher supermajority, making governance changes more straightforward.

While the elimination of the supermajority voting requirement for bylaw amendments was approved, a proposal to eliminate supermajority voting requirements for certificate amendments and director removal did not receive the necessary 80% approval from outstanding shares. Therefore, those specific requirements remain in place.

Stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company's named executive officers with a significant majority voting in favor. Furthermore, the stockholders advised that the company should hold an advisory vote on executive compensation every year, which the Board of Directors has agreed to.

No, the shareholder proposal seeking the adoption of an alternative shareholder right to call a special meeting did not pass, with more votes cast against it than for it.