Skip to content
AnalystLens

MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. Annual Report, Year Ended Dec 31, 1994

Filing Date
Filed March 28, 1995
Period End
December 31, 1994
Securities
MRSHMMC
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q338-K115

MRSH filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 33 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 115 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · Jan ’17Jan ’17
  2. Deal closed8-K · Apr ’19Apr ’19
  3. Material agreement8-K · Apr ’21Apr ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Jul ’25Jul ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-K filed March 28, 1995. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC, reported as MRSH in the request) closed 1994 with revenue of $3,435.0 milliona, up 9% from $3,163.4 million in 1993, and net income of $371.5 million, or $5.05 per share, versus $332.4 million ($4.52) a year earlier.

Income before the cumulative effect of accounting changes rose to $382.0 millionb ($5.19 per share). The $10.5 million after-tax charge for adopting SFAS No. 112 (postemployment benefits) reduced reported net income. Return on average stockholders' equity was 26%, and stockholders' equity reached $1,460.6 million.

The company operates three segments: insurance services (broking, reinsurance broking, program management), consulting (Mercer), and investment management (Putnam). Growth was broad-based but uneven across segments. Investment management was the fastest grower, with revenue up 19% to $615.4 millionc and operating margin expanding to 33.8%, helped by average Putnam assets under management of $93.5 billion and year-end AUM of $95.3 billion.

Insurance services grew 5% to $1,886.5 milliond, with about $27 million of the gain coming from realizing holdings in insurers that MMRC helped organize, so underlying growth was weaker. Management flagged that North American casualty renewal rates were flat to down and that reinsurance premium rates declined in the second half of 1994. Consulting grew 9% to $933.1 million, but its operating margin was only 10.3%, down from 12.8% in 1992.

For investors, the key items are the strong cash generation (operating cash flow of $368.5 million), the dividend increase to $2.80 per share, and the company's exposure to contingent liabilities. The filing discloses claims tied to London market run-off reinsurance disputes and to guaranteed investment contracts sold through Executive Life, but management believes these will not have a material adverse effect.

Total debt is moderate, with long-term debt of $409.4 million and short-term debt of $403.0 million. Note that this filing predates the company's current ticker and naming conventions, and the figures are as originally reported in 1995.

Key Highlights

  1. Revenue rose 9% to $3,435.0 million in 1994, with growth in all three segments: insurance services +5%, consulting +9%, investment management +19%.
  2. Net income was $371.5 million ($5.05 per share), up from $332.4 million ($4.52) in 1993; income before the $10.5 million SFAS No. 112 accounting charge was $382.0 million ($5.19 per share).
  3. Investment management is the growth engine: revenue of $615.4 million with a 33.8% operating margin, and Putnam year-end assets under management of $95.3 billion, up from $90.9 billion.
  4. Insurance services growth was partly flattered by about $27 million from realized gains on insurer holdings organized through Marsh & McLennan Risk Capital; management expected market conditions to stay roughly unchanged in early 1995.
  5. Consulting operating margin fell to 10.3% from 12.8% in 1992 despite 9% revenue growth, highlighting margin pressure in that segment.
  6. Operating cash flow was $368.5 million, and the dividend was raised to $2.80 per share from $2.70 (paid dividends totaled $206.4 million).
  7. Return on average stockholders' equity was 26%, and the company disclosed contingent liabilities from London market run-off reinsurance and Executive Life-related claims, which management does not expect to be materially adverse.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. How did Marsh & McLennan perform financially in 1994?

    Revenue grew 9% to $3,435.0 million and operating income rose 13% to $670.3 million. Net income was $371.5 million, or $5.05 per share, compared with $332.4 million, or $4.52 per share, in 1993. Results were held back slightly by a $10.5 million after-tax charge from adopting SFAS No. 112.

  2. Which business segment drives the most growth and profit?

    Investment management (Putnam) had the fastest growth, with revenue up 19% to $615.4 million, and the highest margin at 33.8%. Insurance services remains the largest segment by revenue ($1,886.5 million) and operating income ($406.1 million), but its growth was smaller and partly driven by one-time gains. Consulting (Mercer) grew 9% to $933.1 million, but with a 10.3% margin it contributes less profit per dollar of revenue.

  3. What are the main risks flagged in the filing?

    Key risks include soft commercial insurance pricing (flat to down casualty renewal rates in North America and falling reinsurance rates in the second half of 1994), sensitivity of Putnam's fees to bond and stock market levels, and errors-and-omissions claims that could be significant. The company also faces disputes over London market run-off reinsurance contracts and claims linked to Executive Life guaranteed investment contracts, though management says these should not have a material adverse effect on results or financial position. Regulatory licensing risk is also highlighted.

  4. How strong is the balance sheet and how is cash being returned to shareholders?

    Total assets were $3,830.6 million and stockholders' equity was $1,460.6 million. Long-term debt was $409.4 million, including a $200 million non-recourse mortgage on the headquarters building, and short-term debt was $403.0 million, mostly commercial paper. Operating cash flow was $368.5 million, and capital spending was $149.1 million. The company paid $206.4 million in dividends ($2.80 per share) and spent $142.8 million repurchasing shares.