8-KCorporate ChangesExhibits & Filings

NEWMONT Corp /DE/ 8-K Report, Bylaw Amendment (Dec 10, 2010)

Filed December 10, 2010For Securities:NEMNEMCL

Summary

This 8-K filing from Newmont Mining Corporation reports a significant change in its corporate governance, specifically the adoption of majority voting in uncontested director elections. Effective December 8, 2010, the company's Board of Directors amended the By-Laws to require nominees for director to receive a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections to be elected. This move aligns with increasing investor demand for greater accountability from corporate boards. In instances where a nominee does not achieve majority support, the amended By-Laws stipulate that the director must tender their resignation. The Board, guided by its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, will then decide whether to accept or reject the resignation within 90 days. This process introduces a more direct mechanism for shareholders to influence board composition, potentially enhancing corporate governance and signaling a commitment to shareholder rights. It's important to note that this majority voting standard only applies to uncontested director elections; plurality voting will continue in contested elections.

Key Highlights

  • 1Newmont Mining Corporation has adopted majority voting in uncontested director elections.
  • 2The amendments to the By-Laws became effective on December 8, 2010.
  • 3A director nominee must receive more than 50% of the votes cast to be elected in uncontested elections.
  • 4If an incumbent director fails to win a majority vote in an uncontested election, they must tender their resignation.
  • 5The Board of Directors, with input from the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, will decide on the tendered resignation within 90 days.
  • 6Plurality voting will remain in effect for contested director elections.
  • 7This change reflects a move towards greater shareholder influence in board elections.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main change is the adoption of majority voting for directors in uncontested elections. This means nominees need to receive more than 50% of the votes cast to be elected, rather than simply the most votes (plurality).

If a director nominee who is already serving on the board does not receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, they are required to tender their resignation to the Board.

The Board of Directors will make the decision on whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, after receiving a recommendation from the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Board must publicly disclose its decision and the rationale within 90 days of the election results.

No, this majority voting standard applies only to uncontested director elections. In contested elections where the number of nominees exceeds the number of available director seats, the company will continue to use a plurality voting standard.