10-QPeriod: Q3 FY2005

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP Quarterly Report for Q3 Ended Sep 30, 2005

Filed October 28, 2005For Securities:NSC

Summary

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) reported a solid third quarter for 2005, demonstrating strong revenue growth driven by increased rates, fuel surcharges, and higher traffic volumes across its key segments, including Coal, General Merchandise, and Intermodal. Net income saw a notable increase year-over-year, boosted by improved operating income and the resolution of coal rate cases. The company is managing its operational costs effectively despite rising fuel prices and increased volume-related expenses. Key financial indicators show a healthy balance sheet with growing working capital and disciplined capital expenditures, largely funded by internal operations. NSC's strategic focus on operational efficiency and managing fuel price volatility through hedging appears to be paying off, with effective hedging programs mitigating some of the impact of higher diesel fuel costs. While the company faced some disruptions from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the financial impact was not material and was covered by insurance. Management expects continued revenue growth and is focused on navigating the evolving labor negotiation landscape and potential regulatory changes. Overall, the report indicates a company in a strong financial position, effectively managing operational challenges and positioning itself for continued growth.

Key Highlights

  • 1Railway operating revenues increased by 16% to $2.2 billion in Q3 2005 compared to Q3 2004, driven by higher rates, fuel surcharges, and increased traffic volume.
  • 2Net income rose to $301 million in Q3 2005, up from $288 million in Q3 2004, attributed to stronger railway operations and favorable non-operating income, partially offset by the absence of a prior year gain from the Conrail Corporate Reorganization.
  • 3Coal revenue saw a significant increase of 22% in Q3 2005 due to higher average revenue per carload and increased utility coal shipments, benefiting from higher natural gas prices and nuclear plant maintenance.
  • 4Railway operating expenses increased by 17% to $1.6 billion, primarily due to higher diesel fuel prices, increased volume-related expenses, and an unfavorable jury verdict in a FELA case.
  • 5The company's fuel hedging program provided benefits of $41 million in Q3 2005, though the percentage of future consumption hedged has declined, indicating potential for higher fuel costs if prices rise.
  • 6Cash provided by operating activities increased to $1.6 billion for the first nine months of 2005, up from $1.2 billion in the prior year, supporting liquidity and investments.
  • 7The company strengthened its balance sheet, with working capital improving from a deficit of $234 million at year-end 2004 to a positive $454 million at September 30, 2005.

Frequently Asked Questions

Revenue growth was primarily driven by a combination of increased average revenues, which included higher rates and fuel surcharges, and a 5% increase in traffic volume (carloads). This growth was observed across all major segments: Coal, General Merchandise, and Intermodal.

Rising diesel fuel prices significantly increased operating expenses, with a 93% surge in expense for Q3 2005 compared to the prior year. Norfolk Southern utilizes a fuel hedging program to manage this risk. While the program provided benefits in Q3 2005, the percentage of future consumption hedged has decreased, and management indicated that diesel fuel expenses could be higher going forward if prices remain elevated or increase further.

While Hurricanes Katrina and Rita caused damage to Norfolk Southern's facilities in the Gulf Coast region, the company reported that the financial impact was not material. Damage was covered by insurance above the self-insurance retention limit, and rail service was restored relatively quickly. A $4 million charge related to the self-insured retention for Hurricane Katrina expenses was included in casualty and other claims.

Norfolk Southern has actively managed its debt, issuing new notes and refinancing existing debt to lower interest costs and extend maturities. The company's debt-to-total capitalization ratio improved to 43.8% at September 30, 2005, from 48.5% at December 31, 2004. The company also has a significant credit facility available and expects to fund its capital expenditures with internally generated funds.