Skip to content
AnalystLens

PEPSICO INC 8-K Report, Shareholder Vote Results (May 8, 2026)

Reports
Shareholder Matters
Filing Date
Filed May 8, 2026
Period End
May 6, 2026
Security
PEP
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q338-K145

PEP filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 33 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 145 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · Jun ’16Jun ’16
  2. Impairment8-K · Feb ’19Feb ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Aug ’21Aug ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Feb ’25Feb ’25

Summary

Summary of the 8-K filed May 8, 2026. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

PepsiCo's 8-K reports the results of its 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, held May 6, 2026.

Shareholders re-elected all 13 director nominees, with each receiving majority support. Support ranged from about 91%a (Robert Pohlad) to about 99% (Sir Dave Lewis) of votes cast for and against. Shareholders also ratified KPMG LLP as the independent auditor for fiscal 2026, with about 92% of votes cast in favor.

This is a routine outcome that signals continued board stability and no auditor change. Shareholders approved, on an advisory basis, the executive compensation program, with about 89%b of votes cast in favor. That is a solid level of support, though lower than a near-unanimous result, and it suggests some investor scrutiny of pay practices.

All three shareholder proposals were defeated. The proposal for an independent board chair received about 26%c support, the human rights oversight report about 17%, and the animal treatment report in the supply chain about 9%. Investors can read these votes as broad backing for management's current governance structure and for its approach to these social and governance topics.

Overall, the filing shows a stable governance picture with no surprises. The main points for investors are the strong director and auditor support, the moderate but clear endorsement of executive pay, and the rejection of all shareholder proposals. Because this is a procedural 8-K, it does not contain financial results, guidance, or strategic announcements.

Key Highlights

  1. All 13 director nominees were elected; the lowest support was Robert C. Pohlad at roughly 91% of votes cast, and the highest was Sir Dave J. Lewis at roughly 99%.
  2. KPMG LLP was ratified as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026, with about 92% of votes cast in favor.
  3. The advisory say-on-pay proposal passed with about 89% of votes cast in favor (889.4M for vs. 109.6M against, with 4.4M abstentions).
  4. The shareholder proposal for an independent board chair was defeated, with only about 26% of votes cast in favor.
  5. The shareholder proposal for a report on human rights oversight was defeated, with about 17% of votes cast in favor.
  6. The shareholder proposal for a report on the treatment of animals in the supply chain was defeated, with only about 9% of votes cast in favor.
  7. Broker non-votes of roughly 168 million shares applied to every director, the say-on-pay vote, and the shareholder proposals, but not to the auditor ratification, which is consistent with routine matters.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Did any PepsiCo director nominee fail to win majority support?

    No. All 13 nominees were elected with substantial majorities. Robert Pohlad had the lowest support at roughly 91% of votes cast (914.4M for vs. 86.8M against), and Sir Dave Lewis had the highest at roughly 99%. Abstentions and broker non-votes did not affect the outcome under the filing's reported figures.

  2. How much support did executive compensation receive, and why does it matter?

    The advisory say-on-pay vote passed with about 89% of votes cast in favor (889.4M for vs. 109.6M against). This is a clear endorsement, but the roughly 11% opposition is a level investors often monitor, since advisory votes below about 70% can prompt heightened shareholder engagement. The vote is non-binding, so it signals investor sentiment rather than forcing a change.

  3. Did shareholders support separating the Chair and CEO roles?

    No. The shareholder proposal for an independent board chair received about 256M votes in favor and 736M against, or roughly 26% support. This indicates that shareholders broadly accepted the current leadership structure, though the level of support is notable for a governance proposal.

  4. Does this filing include any financial results or strategic updates?

    No. This 8-K covers only the matters voted on at the annual meeting. It contains no financial performance data, guidance, dividend announcements, or strategic initiatives. Investors seeking those details should review PepsiCo's earnings releases and periodic SEC reports.