10-QPeriod: Q1 FY2010

Parker-Hannifin Corp Quarterly Report for Q1 Ended Sep 30, 2009

Filed November 3, 2009For Securities:PH

Summary

Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a significant year-over-year decline in net sales for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, down 27.0% to $2.24 billion compared to $3.06 billion in the prior year. This downturn was driven by lower volume across all segments, particularly the Industrial segment, reflecting the challenging global economic environment. Consequently, net income attributable to common shareholders fell to $73.5 million ($0.45 per diluted share) from $250.2 million ($1.50 per diluted share) in the same period last year. The company is actively managing costs and working capital to navigate the downturn. Despite the revenue decline, Parker-Hannifin maintained a strong balance sheet, with a debt-to-debt-equity ratio of 32.5% and ample liquidity through its revolving credit facility. The company has also implemented business realignment charges, including severance costs, to adjust its cost structure to current demand levels. While facing headwinds, management is focused on strategic initiatives for long-term growth and positioning the company for an eventual economic recovery.

Financial Statements
Beta
Revenue$2.24B
Cost of Revenue$1.80B
Gross Profit$436.22M
SG&A Expenses$301.84M
Interest Expense$25.72M
Net Income$73.49M
EPS (Basic)$0.46
EPS (Diluted)$0.45
Shares Outstanding (Basic)160.63M
Shares Outstanding (Diluted)162.04M

Key Highlights

  • 1Net sales decreased significantly by 27.0% to $2.24 billion in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the prior year, reflecting a broad-based volume decline across all business segments.
  • 2Diluted earnings per share (EPS) dropped to $0.45 from $1.50 in the comparable prior-year period, reflecting the impact of lower sales and profitability.
  • 3The Industrial segment, the largest by revenue, experienced a substantial 29.9% decrease in net sales, indicating a widespread impact of the economic slowdown.
  • 4The company incurred $19.3 million in business realignment charges, primarily for severance costs related to plant closures and workforce reductions, to align its cost structure with demand.
  • 5Despite the revenue decline, the company maintained a strong financial position, with a debt-to-debt-equity ratio of 32.5% and $1.26 billion available under its revolving credit facility.
  • 6Inventories remained relatively stable, with days supply at 77 days, indicating effective inventory management in the face of reduced demand.
  • 7Backlog across all segments showed a decrease compared to the prior year, signaling softer order rates, although the Industrial segment saw a sequential increase from June 30, 2009.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary driver of the significant decrease in net sales is a substantial decline in volume across all of Parker-Hannifin's business segments, particularly the Industrial segment. This reflects the challenging global economic environment and reduced demand from customers in various markets.

Parker-Hannifin is actively managing costs through several initiatives. This includes implementing business realignment charges for workforce reductions and plant closures, workforce reductions, salary freezes, and short work weeks. The company is also focused on controlling capital spending and managing working capital, particularly accounts receivable.

The company maintains a strong liquidity position. It generated $260 million in cash flow from operating activities in the quarter and has $1.26 billion available under its revolving credit facility. Management believes its cash flow generation and borrowing capacity are sufficient to support working capital needs, planned growth, dividend payments, and share repurchases.

Yes, Parker-Hannifin's subsidiary, Parker ITR, has been involved in several lawsuits and regulatory investigations concerning alleged price-fixing and market allocation for marine hose. While settlements have been reached in some U.S. class action litigation and fines have been paid in Korea and Europe, an appeal is pending in Europe, and investigations continue in Brazil and Australia. Management believes these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the company's financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations, though specific reserves have been set aside.