10-QPeriod: Q3 FY2015

Parker-Hannifin Corp Quarterly Report for Q3 Ended Mar 31, 2015

Filed May 8, 2015For Securities:PH

Summary

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) reported its third-quarter and nine-month results for fiscal year 2015. For the third quarter, net sales decreased to $3.16 billion from $3.36 billion in the prior year, primarily impacted by foreign currency translation effects, particularly in the Diversified Industrial International segment. However, net income attributable to common shareholders saw a significant increase to $285.3 million, or $2.02 per diluted share, up from $242.4 million, or $1.60 per diluted share, in the same period last year. This improvement in profitability was driven by a higher gross profit margin (25.0% vs. 22.4%) and reduced selling, general, and administrative expenses, partly due to lower business realignment charges. For the first nine months of fiscal 2015, net sales slightly decreased to $9.57 billion from $9.69 billion. Despite the slight revenue dip, net income attributable to common shareholders rose to $832.7 million, or $5.68 per diluted share, compared to $740.0 million, or $4.88 per diluted share, in the comparable prior-year period. The company highlighted an increase in interest expense due to new debt issuance and a significant gain from the deconsolidation of a subsidiary in the prior year which impacted year-over-year comparisons. Management remains focused on financial strength, strategic growth opportunities, and operational efficiency.

Financial Statements
Beta

Key Highlights

  • 1Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2015, were $3.16 billion, a decrease of 5.9% from $3.36 billion in the prior year, largely due to unfavorable currency exchange rates impacting international sales.
  • 2Net income attributable to common shareholders increased by 17.7% to $285.3 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2015, with diluted EPS rising to $2.02 from $1.60 in the prior year.
  • 3Gross profit margin improved to 25.0% from 22.4% in the prior-year quarter, driven by lower business realignment charges, higher volume in Aerospace, and reduced overhead in Diversified Industrial International.
  • 4The company issued $1.5 billion in medium-term notes during the second quarter of fiscal 2015, leading to an increase in long-term debt and a higher debt-to-equity ratio.
  • 5Share repurchases continued, with approximately 3.84 million shares bought back in the third quarter for $477 million.
  • 6The Diversified Industrial Segment's international sales saw a significant decline of 15.4% as reported, impacted by currency headwinds, while the Aerospace Systems Segment experienced a 4.9% increase in net sales.
  • 7The company incurred business realignment charges, with $7.2 million in the current quarter, primarily related to workforce reductions and plant closures, mainly in the Diversified Industrial segment.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary driver for the decrease in net sales was the unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates, particularly affecting the Diversified Industrial International segment. Currency effects reduced net sales by approximately $205 million in the current quarter compared to the prior year.

The company issued $1.5 billion in medium-term notes during the second quarter of fiscal 2015, which increased its long-term debt. This led to a rise in the debt-to-debt-shareholders' equity ratio to 39.7% at March 31, 2015, from 25.9% at June 30, 2014. Management aims to maintain a ratio of no more than 37%.

For the full fiscal year 2015, Parker-Hannifin expects Diversified Industrial North American sales to increase between 1% and 2%, while Diversified Industrial International sales are projected to decrease between 12% and 11%. Operating margins are forecasted to be between 16.2%-16.3% for North America and 12.8%-13.0% for International.

The company is involved in a legal matter concerning its subsidiary Parker ITR regarding alleged marine hose cartel activities in Europe. While a lower court had reduced a fine, the European Court of Justice reversed this decision and sent it back to the lower court. The financial impact and ultimate resolution remain uncertain.