10-QPeriod: Q2 FY2005

SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO Quarterly Report for Q2 Ended Jun 30, 2005

Filed August 8, 2005For Securities:SHW

Summary

Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) reported a strong second quarter and first six months of 2005, demonstrating significant top-line growth and improved profitability. Net sales increased by 21.5% to $1.97 billion for the quarter and 19.3% to $3.50 billion for the first six months, driven by a combination of comparable store sales growth, strategic acquisitions (notably Duron and Paint Sundry Brands), and improved performance in the Automotive Finishes and International Coatings segments. Diluted earnings per share saw a substantial increase of 24.1% to $1.08 in the second quarter and 36.1% to $1.66 for the first six months. This growth was attributed to operating performance improvements, acquisition contributions, a lower effective tax rate, and a reduction in outstanding shares. Despite headwinds from rising raw material costs, which impacted gross margins, the company effectively managed operating expenses and benefited from a favorable tax environment, leading to a robust increase in net income. The company also highlighted ongoing share repurchases and an increased credit facility, signaling confidence in its financial position and future prospects.

Key Highlights

  • 1Net sales increased by 21.5% year-over-year to $1.97 billion for the second quarter of 2005 and by 19.3% to $3.50 billion for the first six months.
  • 2Diluted earnings per share (EPS) grew significantly, up 24.1% to $1.08 for the quarter and 36.1% to $1.66 for the six-month period.
  • 3The Paint Stores segment was a key driver of growth, with net sales up 26.4% for the quarter, boosted by comparable store sales and the Duron acquisition.
  • 4Strategic acquisitions, including Duron and Paint Sundry Brands completed in 2004, contributed significantly to sales growth, adding approximately 8.9% to Q2 sales and 9.0% to six-month sales.
  • 5Gross profit margins saw a slight decline due to increased raw material costs, but this was partially offset by price increases, improved factory utilization, and effective SG&A expense management.
  • 6The effective tax rate decreased to 29.9% in Q2 2005 and 27.4% for the six months, down from 35.0% in the prior year, due to favorable audit settlements and tax benefits from foreign operations.
  • 7The company actively repurchased shares, with 1.0 million shares bought under its repurchase program in Q2, and increased its revolving credit facility to $910 million effective July 20, 2005.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sherwin-Williams' sales growth in the second quarter of 2005 was primarily driven by strong comparable store sales, particularly in the Paint Stores segment, and the impact of strategic acquisitions, notably Duron, Inc. and Paint Sundry Brands Corporation, which were integrated during 2004. Improvements in the Automotive Finishes and International Coatings segments also contributed to the overall increase.

Rising raw material costs did impact gross profit margins, causing them to decline slightly in both the second quarter and the first six months compared to the prior year. However, the company was able to partially mitigate this impact through price increases, improved factory utilization due to higher volumes, and effective management of selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses.

Sherwin-Williams is a defendant in numerous legal proceedings related to lead pigment and lead-based paints. The company believes the litigation is without merit and is vigorously defending itself. While management believes they will ultimately be successful, they cannot predict the outcome, the number of future claims, or the potential costs, and have not accrued any amounts for this litigation. An adverse outcome could have a material impact on net income, liquidity, or financial condition due to the uncertainties involved.

The reduction in the effective tax rate, from 35.0% in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 to 29.9% and 27.4% respectively in 2005, had a positive impact on net income. This decrease was attributed to favorable factors such as the settlement of federal and state audit issues and tax benefits related to foreign operations, contributing to the overall increase in diluted EPS.