8-KLeadership ChangesExhibits & Filings

SOUTHERN CO 8-K Report, Executive Changes (Nov 22, 2006)

Filed November 22, 2006For Securities:SOSOJESOJFSOJCSOJDSOMN

Summary

This 8-K filing by Southern Company (SO) details significant amendments to its "Change in Control Benefits Protection Plan" and associated executive agreements, approved on November 16, 2006. These amendments are designed to enhance protection for employees, particularly key officers, in the event of a change in control of the company. Key changes include revised triggers for funding a deferred compensation trust, modifications to performance-based compensation payouts (Performance Pay Program and Performance Dividend Program), and adjustments to the definition of "good reason" for executive termination following a change in control. Investors should note the increased sensitivity of the funding triggers, requiring a lower threshold of shareholder ownership (50% or less of voting power) compared to the previous plan (65% or less) to initiate fund transfers. The changes also impact how performance-based compensation and dividend payments are calculated in a change of control scenario, generally aiming to provide greater certainty or benefit to participants. The revised "good reason" definition is more specific regarding benefit reductions and includes provisions for subsidiary-level changes in control. These updates are crucial for understanding executive compensation and potential liabilities in future corporate restructuring or acquisition scenarios.

Key Highlights

  • 1Southern Company amended its Change in Control Benefits Protection Plan and executive Change in Control Agreements on November 16, 2006.
  • 2The amendments revise the definition of a "change in control" by lowering the voting power threshold for shareholders of the surviving company from 65% to 50%.
  • 3Funding obligations for the Deferred Compensation Trust are triggered by specific ownership percentages and board representation changes post-merger or acquisition.
  • 4Changes were made to the payout calculations for the Performance Pay Program (PPP) and Performance Dividend Program (PDP) upon a change in control.
  • 5Under the Amended Plan, termination for "good reason" by an officer following a change in control has been clarified, with specific reference to material reductions in benefits and severance agreement offers.
  • 6The Amended Plan includes provisions for subsidiary change in control events, making funding discretionary unless key subsidiaries like Alabama Power or Georgia Power are involved.
  • 7These updates aim to provide enhanced benefits and protections for employees and officers in the event of a corporate change of control.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary purpose of this 8-K filing is to report significant amendments made to Southern Company's "Change in Control Benefits Protection Plan" and related executive "Change in Control Agreements." These changes are designed to bolster employee and officer protections in the event of a merger, acquisition, or other change in control scenario.

The main difference is the threshold for shareholder ownership. Previously, a change in control was triggered if Southern Company shareholders ended up owning 65% or less of the surviving company's voting power. The amended plan lowers this threshold to 50% or less. Similarly, the threshold for an individual owning a significant stake increased from 20% to 35%.

The amendments modify how performance-based compensation (PPP and PDP) is paid out. For the PPP, participants will now receive a pro-rata payment based on the target award if the program is terminated within two years of a change in control. For the PDP, payments will be based on the greater of 50% of the dividend actually paid or the actual performance, a change from the previous reliance solely on actual performance. The definition of "good reason" for executive termination has also been revised, potentially impacting severance packages.

While the core plan amendments apply to the parent company, the funding obligations for the Deferred Compensation Trust can be discretionary for subsidiary changes in control, unless the subsidiary involved is one of the major operating companies like Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, or Mississippi Power Company.