Were there any significant surprises or concerns raised in the shareholder vote?

The voting results generally showed strong shareholder support for the company's nominees for director and its executive compensation program. The shareholder proposal for action by written consent was the most contentious, failing to pass by a narrow margin, which might indicate some level of shareholder desire for enhanced governance flexibility in that area.

What does it mean that executive compensation was approved 'on an advisory basis'?

An advisory vote on executive compensation, often called a 'say-on-pay' vote, is a non-binding vote by shareholders on the compensation of the company's top executives. While the board is not legally required to follow the outcome, it is considered an important indicator of shareholder sentiment and a valuable feedback mechanism for the board regarding compensation practices.

What is the significance of the 'Broker Non-Votes'?

Broker non-votes occur when a broker holding shares in 'street name' for a beneficial owner does not have discretionary voting authority for a particular proposal and the beneficial owner has not provided voting instructions. The absence of broker non-votes for the auditor ratification suggests this is a routine matter where brokers typically have discretionary power or all shareholders provided instructions. For other proposals, a significant number of broker non-votes indicates that a considerable portion of shares held in street name were not voted on those specific matters.

Who is Ernst & Young LLP and why is their ratification important?

Ernst & Young LLP is a major global accounting firm that served as The McGraw-Hill Companies' independent registered public accounting firm. Ratifying their appointment is a standard governance practice that ensures the company's financial statements are audited by an independent third party, which is crucial for investor confidence in the accuracy and reliability of the company's financial reporting.

SPGI 8-K: Shareholder Matters

Summary

This Form 8-K filing from The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (now S&P Global Inc.) details the results of their Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 25, 2012. The primary focus is on the voting outcomes for key corporate governance matters, including the election of directors, advisory approval of executive compensation, ratification of the independent auditor, and a shareholder proposal regarding written consent. The filing provides transparency into shareholder sentiment on these important issues.

Key Highlights

1All nominated directors were elected by a significant majority of shareholder votes, indicating confidence in the board's leadership.
2Shareholders approved, on an advisory basis, the executive compensation program for named executive officers, with a substantial 'For' vote.
3The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2012 was overwhelmingly ratified by shareholders.
4A shareholder proposal requesting the ability for shareholders to act by written consent was narrowly defeated, with more 'Against' votes than 'For' votes.
5Broker non-votes were recorded for most proposals, with the exception of the auditor ratification, suggesting a portion of shares were not voted by custodians.
6The filing reflects the company's commitment to shareholder engagement and transparency by reporting these voting results.

S&P Global Inc. 8-K Report, Shareholder Vote Results (Apr 27, 2012)

Summary

Key Highlights

Frequently Asked Questions