Summary
Sempra Energy (SRE) announced two significant events in this 8-K filing dated December 16, 2004. Firstly, the company entered into a substantial $1.25 billion five-year revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders, with Citicorp USA, Inc. acting as the administrative agent. This facility, which allows for revolving credit borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit up to $200 million, provides Sempra Energy LNG and other designated subsidiaries with significant financial flexibility. The credit agreement is guaranteed by Sempra Energy and includes a covenant requiring the company to maintain total indebtedness at no more than 65 percent of total capitalization. Secondly, Sempra Energy provided an update on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Border Price Investigation concerning its subsidiary, Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). The CPUC commissioners voted 3-2 to reject a modified proposed decision from the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that had been critical of SoCalGas's activities during the March 2000-May 2001 energy crisis. The majority of commissioners indicated that SoCalGas acted in the best interests of its customers. However, the investigation's future remains somewhat uncertain due to expiring commissioner terms, with a final decision in the first phase expected in 2005.
Key Highlights
- 1Sempra Energy entered into a $1.25 billion five-year revolving credit agreement effective December 14, 2004.
- 2The credit facility is managed by Citicorp USA, Inc. as administrative agent and allows for borrowings and letters of credit.
- 3Sempra Energy LNG and other designated subsidiaries are permitted borrowers under the agreement.
- 4The credit agreement includes a guarantee from Sempra Energy and a leverage covenant limiting total indebtedness to 65% of total capitalization.
- 5The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) rejected a proposed decision critical of SoCalGas's past energy market activities.
- 6CPUC Commissioners voted 3-2 to reject the ALJ's modified proposed decision, with the majority believing SoCalGas acted in its customers' best interests.
- 7The final decision in the first phase of the CPUC investigation is expected in 2005, with the potential for ongoing proceedings or reassignment of the case.