Summary
State Street Corporation (STT) announced a significant change to its executive compensation structure on March 31, 2014, concerning change-of-control agreements. Specifically, the company has eliminated the "gross-up" provisions for excise taxes related to "golden parachute" payments. This means that in the event of a change of control that triggers these excise taxes, executives will now be responsible for paying those taxes themselves, rather than the company covering them. This move was initiated by the executive officers themselves, who offered to amend their agreements. The amendments adjust how potential excess compensation in a change-of-control scenario is handled. Previously, a gross-up payment would cover excise taxes if benefits exceeded a certain threshold. Now, if benefits exceed this threshold, the company will either reduce the benefits to avoid the tax or allow the executive to receive the full benefits and pay the tax, whichever results in the greatest after-tax benefit for the executive. This change aligns executive compensation more closely with after-tax outcomes and potentially reduces corporate liabilities associated with such events.
Key Highlights
- 1Elimination of Change-of-Control Excise Tax Gross-Up Provisions: State Street executives will no longer receive company-paid "gross-ups" to cover excise taxes on "golden parachute" payments.
- 2Executive-Initiated Amendments: The amendments to change-of-control agreements were proposed by the company's executive officers.
- 3Shift in Tax Responsibility: Executives are now personally responsible for any excise taxes incurred on change-of-control benefits exceeding IRS limits.
- 4Revised Benefit Calculation: In scenarios where change-of-control benefits exceed 110% of the 2.99x base amount threshold, executives will choose between a benefit "cutback" or paying the tax themselves for the greatest after-tax benefit.
- 5Application to Key Executives: The amendments apply to named senior executives including the CEO, CFO, and other Vice Chairmen and Presidents.
- 6Alignment with Shareholder Interests: This change can be viewed positively by investors as it reduces potential company expenses and aligns executive financial outcomes more directly with the tax implications of "golden parachute" provisions.