What is the primary purpose of the amendments to the Executive Officer Change in Control Agreements?

The primary purposes are to ensure compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and to add new two-year post-employment non-compete and non-solicitation provisions for the covered executives.

How do these amendments affect the benefits provided to executives in case of a change in control?

The amendments primarily add restrictive covenants (non-compete, non-solicit) and ensure tax compliance. For Michael A. Bradley, existing change-in-control benefits were consolidated into his CIC agreement without increasing the amount of salary or benefits. The equity vesting provision in his separation agreement was added to support the enforceability of these new covenants.

What are the implications of the non-compete and non-solicitation clauses for Teradyne?

These clauses are designed to protect Teradyne's competitive position by preventing former executives from joining competitors or soliciting its clients and employees for a period of two years after their employment ends under specific circumstances. This is intended to safeguard proprietary information and business relationships.

Does the amendment to Michael A. Bradley's Separation Agreement increase his potential payout?

No, the amendment to Mr. Bradley's Separation Agreement did not increase the amount of salary payments or benefit coverage. It consolidated existing change-in-control provisions and added a provision for continued equity vesting during the salary continuation period, which is contingent on his compliance with the new restrictive covenants.

TER 8-K: Leadership Changes

Summary

Teradyne, Inc. (TER) filed an 8-K on January 6, 2009, to disclose amendments to its Executive Officer Change in Control Agreements (CIC Agreements) and Michael A. Bradley's Separation Agreement, effective December 30, 2008. The primary purpose of these amendments was to ensure compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and to introduce non-compete and non-solicitation provisions for a period of two years post-employment. For investors, these changes primarily relate to executive compensation and potential severance arrangements in the event of a change in control or termination. The inclusion of 409A compliance language is standard practice for tax regulation adherence. Importantly, the non-compete and non-solicit clauses aim to protect the company's interests by restricting key executives from working for competitors or soliciting clients and employees for a defined period after leaving the company under specific circumstances. Additionally, Michael A. Bradley's Separation Agreement was updated to include continued vesting of equity awards during the salary continuation period, aimed at enhancing the enforceability of restrictive covenants and aligning with industry practices.

Key Highlights

1Teradyne amended its Executive Officer Change in Control Agreements for key executives, including the CEO and CFO, effective December 30, 2008.
2These amendments incorporate language required for compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
3New two-year post-employment non-compete provisions have been added to the CIC Agreements.
4New two-year post-employment customer and employee non-solicitation provisions have also been added.
5Michael A. Bradley's Separation Agreement was amended to move change-in-control provisions into his CIC agreement for consistency, without increasing benefits.
6Mr. Bradley's Separation Agreement now includes a provision for continued vesting of equity awards during a two-year salary continuation period, contingent on adherence to non-compete and non-solicitation clauses.
7The company aims to enhance the enforceability of restrictive covenants and ensure consistency in executive agreements.

TERADYNE, INC 8-K Report, Executive Changes (Jan 6, 2009)

Summary

Key Highlights

Frequently Asked Questions