Skip to content
AnalystLens

TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP Annual Report, Year Ended Dec 31, 2000

Filing Date
Filed March 16, 2001
Period End
December 31, 2000
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q338-K196

TFC filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 33 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 196 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. FY2016 annual report10-K · Feb ’17Feb ’17
  2. Deal closed8-K · Dec ’19Dec ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Oct ’21Oct ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Oct ’25Oct ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-K filed March 16, 2001. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Important note: this filing is BB&T Corporation's (NYSE: BBT) 2000 Form 10-K, filed March 16, 2001, not Truist Financial (TFC).

BB&T became part of Truist only in 2019 through its merger with SunTrust. BB&T is a Winston-Salem, North Carolina financial holding company with about $59.3 billiona in total assets at December 31, 2000, operating 854 banking offices across the Carolinas, Virginia, Maryland, Georgia, West Virginia, Tennessee, Kentucky and Washington, D.C. Reported 2000 earnings fell to $626.4 million, or $1.55 per diluted share, from $705.6 million, or $1.75, in 1999.

The decline reflects roughly $248.6 millionb in after-tax nonrecurring charges, mainly merger-related costs and a securities portfolio restructuring that produced about $222 million in pretax losses. Excluding these items, management reports net income of $875.1 million, or $2.17 per diluted share. Core operating metrics were solid: net interest income rose to $2.0 billion, the FTE net interest margin was 4.19% (down from 4.27%), net charge-offs improved to 0.25% of average loans, and nonperforming assets were a low 0.33% of total assets.

Noninterest income fell 11.2% to $777.0 millionc, largely because of the securities losses. Capital remained strong, with a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 9.3%, a total risk-based ratio of 12.0%, and a leverage ratio of 7.1%, all well above regulatory thresholds for well-capitalized status. Shareholders' equity reached $4.8 billion.

The company raised its annual cash dividend 14.7% to $0.86d per share, its 28th consecutive annual increase. BB&T also continued an aggressive acquisition strategy, completing FCNB Corp. in January 2001 and FirstSpartan in March 2001, with pending deals for Century South Banks, Virginia Capital Bancshares and F&M National Corporation.

Key Highlights

  1. Reported 2000 net income of $626.4 million ($1.55 diluted EPS), down from $705.6 million ($1.75) in 1999, after about $248.6 million in after-tax nonrecurring charges; excluding these items, EPS would have been $2.17.
  2. A roughly $222 million pretax securities restructuring loss (sale of $5.9 billion of securities) was undertaken to improve portfolio yield by 133 basis points on the restructured portion, with management expecting to recover the loss over three years.
  3. Total assets grew to $59.3 billion (up 12% year over year), with total deposits of $38.0 billion (up 11.3%) and loans and leases of $39.5 billion (up 11.5%).
  4. Asset quality remained strong: net charge-offs were 0.25% of average loans, the allowance covered 1.30% of loans and 5.45x net charge-offs, and nonperforming assets were $193.5 million (0.33% of total assets).
  5. Return on average assets was 1.14% and return on average common equity was 14.55% on a reported basis; excluding nonrecurring items, ROA was 1.59% and ROE was 20.33%.
  6. Capital ratios were well above well-capitalized thresholds: Tier 1 risk-based 9.3%, total risk-based 12.0%, Tier 1 leverage 7.1%. Dividends rose 14.7% to $0.86 per share.
  7. Expansion continued through acquisitions, including One Valley Bancorp (about $6.4 billion in assets, July 2000), BankFirst, FCNB Corp. and FirstSpartan, with pending mergers for Century South Banks, Virginia Capital Bancshares and F&M National Corporation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Why did BB&T's reported earnings decline in 2000 even though the core business grew?

    Reported net income fell about 11% to $626.4 million, but this was driven by one-time items. BB&T recorded about $248.6 million in after-tax nonrecurring charges, largely from merger-related expenses (Premier, Hardwick, First Banking and One Valley) and a securities portfolio restructuring that generated about $222 million in pretax losses. Excluding these items, net income rose about 14% to $875.1 million, and diluted EPS would have been $2.17 versus $1.91 in 1999 on the same basis.

  2. How healthy is BB&T's loan portfolio and credit quality?

    Credit quality was stable to improving. Net charge-offs fell to 0.25% of average loans from 0.27% in 1999. Nonperforming assets rose 26.8% to $193.5 million, but remained only 0.33% of total assets. Nonaccrual and restructured loans were 0.37% of loans, and the allowance for loan and lease losses was $522.0 million, or 1.30% of loans, with a 5.45x coverage ratio of net charge-offs. Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing rose to $72.3 million, which investors may want to monitor.

  3. Is BB&T's dividend secure, and how well capitalized is the company?

    The dividend appears secure. Cash dividends rose 14.7% to $0.86 per share in 2000, the 28th consecutive annual increase, though the payout ratio rose to 54.8% on a reported basis (39.3% excluding nonrecurring items). Capital is strong: the Tier 1 risk-based ratio was 9.3%, the total risk-based ratio 12.0%, and the Tier 1 leverage ratio 7.1%, and BB&T and all its banks were classified as well capitalized. Shareholders' equity grew 17.8% to $4.8 billion, partly through shares issued for acquisitions.

  4. What are the main risks to BB&T's earnings outlook?

    Key risks include interest rate sensitivity and margin compression: the net interest margin fell 8 basis points to 4.19% as funding costs rose. Mortgage banking income fell 37% to $103.1 million due to lower origination activity and losses on loan sales. Noninterest expense rose 6.9% to $1.76 billion, and integration costs from the many acquisitions are a continuing factor. Management's simulation shows net interest income could change by as much as 1.5% under the stated rate scenarios, within its policy limits. Future acquisitions could also dilute earnings per share or book value.