Skip to content
AnalystLens

Targa Resources Corp. 8-K Report, Shareholder Vote Results (May 21, 2025)

Reports
Shareholder Matters
Filing Date
Filed May 21, 2025
Period End
May 20, 2025
Security
TRGP
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K170

TRGP filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 170 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Leadership change8-K · Sep ’18Sep ’18
  2. Material agreement8-K · Aug ’20Aug ’20
  3. Material agreement8-K · Sep ’22Sep ’22
  4. Leadership change8-K · Aug ’26Aug ’26

Summary

Summary of the 8-K filed May 21, 2025. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) held its 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 20, 2025, and this Form 8-K reports the final results of the three proposals.

Stockholders re-elected four Class III directors to terms expiring at the 2028 annual meeting, ratified PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditor for 2025, and approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers for fiscal 2024. All three proposals passed. The filing contains no financial results, guidance, or transaction disclosures.

The auditor ratification and say-on-pay proposals received broad support. The auditor was ratified with roughly 97%a of votes cast in favor, and say-on-pay was approved with roughly 94% of votes cast in favor. Director support was more varied.

Caron A. Lawhorn (about 99%b) and Matthew J. Meloy (about 98%) drew strong backing, Rene R.

Joyce (about 92%c) was supported by a clear majority, and Waters S. Davis, IV, received the lowest support at about 87%, with roughly 23.9 million votes against. Under the filing's voting results, all four nominees were elected.

For investors, the 8-K is primarily a governance update. The results indicate general stockholder acceptance of the board slate, the auditor, and executive pay practices, with the most notable dissent directed at Mr. Davis. The percentages above are calculated by this analysis from the reported vote counts, using votes for plus votes against as the denominator and excluding abstentions and broker non-votes.

Key Highlights

  1. Annual Meeting held May 20, 2025; all three proposals approved by stockholders.
  2. Four Class III directors re-elected to terms expiring at the 2028 Annual Meeting: Waters S. Davis, IV; Rene R. Joyce; Caron A. Lawhorn; and Matthew J. Meloy.
  3. Director support ranged from roughly 87% (Davis) to roughly 99% (Lawhorn) of votes cast, based on votes for versus against.
  4. Waters S. Davis, IV received the lowest support of the nominees, with about 23.9 million votes against (roughly 13% of votes cast).
  5. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was ratified as independent auditor for 2025, with about 97% of votes cast in favor.
  6. Advisory say-on-pay proposal for 2024 named executive officer compensation was approved, with about 94% of votes cast in favor.
  7. The filing reports no financial results, guidance, or transactions; the full proposal details are in the Schedule 14A proxy statement filed March 28, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Did the stockholders approve all proposals at the 2025 Annual Meeting?

    Yes. All four Class III director nominees were elected, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was ratified as the independent auditor for 2025, and the advisory say-on-pay proposal for 2024 executive compensation was approved.

  2. How much support did the director nominees receive?

    Support was strong overall but varied. Lawhorn received about 182.1 million votes for against 1.4 million against (about 99%), and Meloy received about 179.7 million for against 3.7 million (about 98%). Joyce received about 169.5 million for against 14.0 million (about 92%), and Davis received about 159.6 million for against 23.9 million (about 87%). These percentages are calculated from votes for and against, excluding abstentions and broker non-votes.

  3. Why did Waters S. Davis, IV receive more opposition than the other nominees?

    The filing reports vote counts but does not state reasons for the opposition. Investors seeking the rationale would need to consult the proxy statement or any subsequent stockholder engagement disclosures.

  4. What does the advisory say-on-pay vote mean for the company?

    The vote is non-binding, but roughly 94% of votes cast approved the 2024 named executive officer compensation. This suggests broad stockholder support for the company's pay practices, though the board is not required to act on the result.

  5. Does this filing indicate any change to the company's financial position or strategy?

    No. The 8-K covers only the annual meeting voting results and includes no financial, operational, or strategic disclosures. Investors should review the company's periodic reports and the March 28, 2025 proxy statement for detailed information.