Skip to content
AnalystLens

UNITED RENTALS, INC. Quarterly Report for Q2 Ended Jun 30, 2009

Filing Date
Filed July 29, 2009
Period End
June 30, 2009
Security
URI
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K170

URI filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 170 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Deal closed8-K · Oct ’17Oct ’17
  2. Leadership change8-K · May ’19May ’19
  3. Material agreement8-K · Aug ’21Aug ’21
  4. Material agreement8-K · Aug ’25Aug ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-Q filed July 29, 2009. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

United Rentals, Inc. (URI) reported a net loss of $17 milliona for the second quarter of 2009, compared to a net income of $37 million in the same period of 2008.

This downturn was primarily driven by a significant decrease in equipment rental revenues, down 27.7% year-over-year, reflecting the broader economic challenges impacting the construction and industrial sectors. The company has been actively managing costs through restructuring initiatives, including headcount reductions and branch closures, which resulted in restructuring charges. Despite the challenging top-line performance, United Rentals generated positive operating cash flow of $205 millionb in the first half of 2009 and ended the quarter with $125 million in cash and cash equivalents.

The company also reduced its debt by repurchasing outstanding debt securities, recognizing gains on these transactions. Management is focused on optimizing fleet management, cost controls, and free cash flow generation to navigate the economic downturn and strengthen its market position.

Key Highlights

  1. Net loss of $17 million for Q2 2009, a significant decline from a $37 million net income in Q2 2008.
  2. Total revenues decreased by 26.1% to $615 million in Q2 2009 compared to $831 million in Q2 2008, largely due to a 27.7% drop in equipment rental revenue.
  3. Operating income significantly decreased to $5 million in Q2 2009 from $128 million in Q2 2008.
  4. The company incurred $20 million in restructuring charges in Q2 2009 related to branch closures and severance costs.
  5. Cash flow from operations remained positive at $205 million for the first six months of 2009, though down from $447 million in the prior year.
  6. United Rentals actively managed its debt, repurchasing and retiring debt securities, resulting in recognized gains.
  7. The company's balance sheet shows a decrease in total assets from $4,191 million at year-end 2008 to $3,918 million at June 30, 2009, and a reduction in total liabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the company's financial performance compared to the prior year's quarter?

    United Rentals experienced a significant decline in financial performance. For the second quarter of 2009, the company reported a net loss of $17 million, a sharp contrast to a net income of $37 million in the same period of 2008. Revenues also fell by 26.1% to $615 million.

  2. What are the primary drivers of the revenue decline?

    The primary driver of the revenue decline is a substantial decrease in equipment rental revenue, which fell by 27.7% year-over-year. This is attributed to the challenging economic environment affecting construction and industrial activities, leading to lower rental rates and reduced equipment utilization.

  3. How is the company managing costs amidst the economic downturn?

    United Rentals is implementing cost-saving measures, including restructuring charges of $20 million in the quarter for branch closures and severance costs. The company is also focused on optimizing fleet management and general cost controls to mitigate the impact of reduced revenues.

  4. What is the company's liquidity and debt situation?

    The company generated $205 million in operating cash flow in the first half of 2009 and ended the quarter with $125 million in cash. United Rentals has also been actively repurchasing and retiring debt, which resulted in recognized gains. While liquidity appears adequate for the near term, the company is operating in a challenging credit environment with below investment-grade ratings.