Skip to content
AnalystLens

VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC / MA Annual Report, Year Ended Dec 31, 2016

Filing Date
Filed February 23, 2017
Period End
December 31, 2016
Security
VRTX
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K100

VRTX filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 100 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Leadership change8-K · Apr ’20Apr ’20
  2. Material agreement8-K · Jul ’22Jul ’22
  3. Leadership change8-K · Oct ’26Oct ’26

Summary

Summary of the 10-K filed February 23, 2017. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Vertex Pharmaceuticals' FY2016 10-K shows a company in commercial transition, with net product revenues rising 68% to $1.68 billiona, driven by ORKAMBI (launched mid-2015), which generated $979.6 million, up from $350.7 million.

KALYDECO grew to $703.4 millionb. Total revenues reached $1.70 billion versus $1.03 billion in 2015. Net loss attributable to Vertex narrowed sharply to $112.1 million ($0.46 per share) from $556.3 million, and operating income turned positive at $9.9 million, the first annual operating profit cited in the filing's comparison period.

The investment case rests on the pipeline and on ORKAMBI's ex-U.S. reimbursement path. Management expects to file an NDA for tezacaftor/ivacaftor in the second half of 2017 if Phase 3 data in the first half of 2017 are supportive, with triple-combination data from next-generation correctors (VX-152, VX-440) expected in the second half. Risk factors emphasize heavy dependence on CF revenues, with ORKAMBI and KALYDECO together accounting for nearly all revenue.

KALYDECO was about 41% of 2016 revenues, and ORKAMBI's growth depends on European reimbursement timing, patient discontinuations, and a 2016 FDA complete response letter for ivacaftor in residual-function mutations. Balance sheet actions improved liquidity. Cash, equivalents and marketable securities rose to $1.43 billionc.

Vertex entered a $500 milliond revolving credit facility in October 2016, drew $300 million, and repaid it in February 2017. A subsequent January 2017 Merck KGaA deal brings a $230 million upfront payment for four oncology programs. Research and development expense of $1.05 billion remains very large relative to revenue, and the company has not yet reached sustained GAAP profitability.

Key Highlights

  1. Net product revenues grew 68% to $1.68B in 2016, led by ORKAMBI ($979.6M, up from $350.7M) and KALYDECO ($703.4M, up 11%).
  2. Operating income turned positive at $9.9M in 2016, versus an operating loss of $466.9M in 2015. Net loss attributable to Vertex narrowed to $112.1M ($0.46/share) from $556.3M.
  3. Tezacaftor + ivacaftor Phase 3 data expected 1H 2017, with a planned NDA in 2H 2017 if supported. Next-generation triple-combination data (VX-152, VX-440) expected 2H 2017.
  4. Concentration risk is high: ORKAMBI and KALYDECO account for substantially all revenue, and KALYDECO alone was ~41% of 2016 revenue.
  5. Ex-U.S. ORKAMBI revenue was only ~$76.4M in 2016 (mostly Germany), with France revenue unrecognized pending reimbursement. European reimbursement timing is a key 2017 driver.
  6. Liquidity of $1.43B in cash and marketable securities; $300M revolver drawn in 2016 was repaid in February 2017. Merck KGaA deal adds a $230M upfront payment in 2017, subject to HSR clearance.
  7. R&D expense of $1.05B (62% of total costs) and a $4.1B federal NOL carryforward underscore the continued investment burden and the long path to sustained profitability.

Follow one dollar

For each $1.00 of revenue in FY2016, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc lost $0.07.

  1. Revenue$1.70B100.0%
  2. Cost of revenue−$210.5M12.4%
  3. Gross profit$1.49B87.6%
  4. Operating costs−$1.48B87.1%
  5. Operating income$9.9M0.6%
  6. Interest, other & tax−$122.0M7.2%
  7. Net income−$112.1M6.6%
Computed from 10-KFY2016filed February 23, 2017Computed from this filing’s revenue, gross profit, operating income and net income · right columngrey figure: share of revenue

Where FY2016 revenue went

$1.70B
  • R&D: $1.05B, 62% of revenue
  • SG&A: $432.8M, 25% of revenue
  • Cost of revenue: $210.5M, 12% of revenue
  • Operating income: $9.9M, 0.6% of revenue

Kept 0.6% as operating incomeOperating income $9.9M · 0.6%

Full revenue history →

Financial Statements

FY2016 against FY2015

Line itemFY2016FY2015Change
Revenue$1.70B$1.03B+64.9%
Cost of Revenue$210.46M$117.15M+79.6%
Gross Profit$1.49B$915.18M+63.0%
R&D Expenses$1.05B$995.92M+5.2%
SG&A Expenses$432.83M$376.57M+14.9%
Operating Expenses$1.69B$1.50B+12.9%
Operating Income$9.94M-$466.88M+102.1%
Net Income-$112.05M-$556.33M+79.9%
EPS (Basic)$-0.46$-2.31+80.1%
EPS (Diluted)$-0.46$-2.31+80.1%
Shares Outstanding (Basic)244.69M241.31M+1.4%
Shares Outstanding (Diluted)244.69M241.31M+1.4%

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. How much did Vertex's revenue grow in 2016, and what drove it?

    Total revenues rose 65% to $1.70 billion from $1.03 billion. Growth came mainly from ORKAMBI, which began selling in mid-2015 and reached $979.6 million in 2016, plus a 11% increase in KALYDECO to $703.4 million. Royalty and collaborative revenues declined.

  2. Is Vertex profitable now?

    Not on a full-year net basis. The company reported a net loss attributable to Vertex of $112.1 million ($0.46 per share) for 2016, although this is a large improvement from $556.3 million in 2015. Operating income was slightly positive at $9.9 million, the first annual operating profit in the period shown, helped by a $54.9 million non-cash charge tied to VIE contingent payments that increased the loss. The filing notes a history of losses and no assurance of future profitability.

  3. What are the key catalysts for 2017?

    Tezacaftor + ivacaftor Phase 3 data (1H 2017) and a planned NDA filing (2H 2017); next-generation corrector data (VX-152, VX-440) in 2H 2017; an EMA filing for ORKAMBI in children aged 6-11 in 1H 2017; and ex-U.S. reimbursement progress for ORKAMBI, especially in Europe and France.

  4. What are the biggest risks to investors?

    Dependence on CF products, with ORKAMBI and KALYDECO providing nearly all revenue; slow ex-U.S. reimbursement; patient discontinuation rates on ORKAMBI; competition from other CF developers (e.g., AbbVie/Galapagos, PTC, Proteostasis); and pipeline failure risk, as shown by a 2016 futility stop of a tezacaftor trial. The filing also cites a DOJ subpoena related to bioanalytical lab practices and a securities class action that was dismissed in 2016.

  5. How is Vertex funding its operations and pipeline?

    Primarily from product cash flow and existing cash. Cash and marketable securities were $1.43 billion at year-end 2016. The company repaid its $300 million revolver in February 2017 and expects the $230 million Merck KGaA upfront payment in 2017. It also has large lease obligations, including about $887 million in Fan Pier lease commitments through 2028, and contingent milestone obligations to collaborators.