10-QPeriod: Q2 FY2003

WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. Quarterly Report for Q2 Ended Jun 30, 2003

Filed August 12, 2003For Securities:WMB

Summary

Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) reported a significant shift in financial performance for the six months ended June 30, 2003, compared to the same period in 2002. The company's strategy to divest non-core assets and bolster liquidity is evident, with substantial proceeds generated from asset sales, including the divestiture of retail travel centers, the Midsouth refinery, and Texas Gas Transmission Corporation. This strategic repositioning resulted in a reported net income of $269.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003, a stark contrast to a loss of $349.1 million in the prior year's quarter, and a net loss of $544.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 (impacted by a cumulative effect of accounting changes). Operating income improved significantly across most segments, notably Energy Marketing & Trading, which moved from a substantial loss to a profit, driven by new accounting standards and strategic adjustments. The company is actively managing its debt, having issued new debt and used proceeds to redeem preferred stock and retire other long-term obligations. Liquidity appears sufficient, supported by cash on hand, operational cash flow, and ongoing asset sales. However, the company faces ongoing challenges, including significant legal and regulatory proceedings, particularly in its Energy Marketing & Trading segment related to California energy markets, and the inherent risks of commodity price volatility and counterparty credit risk in its energy trading activities.

Key Highlights

  • 1Significant turnaround in quarterly net income, moving from a $349.1 million loss in Q2 2002 to a $269.7 million profit in Q2 2003.
  • 2Total revenues surged to $8.7 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2003, up from $2.0 billion in the prior year, primarily due to adoption of new accounting standards for energy trading and significant asset sales.
  • 3The company generated $2.4 billion in net proceeds from asset sales in the first half of 2003 as part of a strategy to reduce debt and improve liquidity.
  • 4Energy Marketing & Trading segment showed a dramatic improvement, swinging from a $497.5 million loss in Q2 2002 to a $348.0 million profit in Q2 2003, driven by accounting changes and improved gross margins.
  • 5Long-term debt remains substantial at over $11.2 billion, but the company has actively managed its debt profile through new issuances and redemptions.
  • 6Ongoing significant legal and regulatory challenges, particularly concerning Energy Marketing & Trading's activities in California energy markets, continue to pose a risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

The substantial increase in revenues, particularly in the Energy Marketing & Trading segment, was primarily driven by the adoption of EITF Issue No. 02-3. This new accounting standard required a shift from reporting certain energy trading and risk management contracts on a net basis to a gross basis, significantly inflating reported revenues and costs. Additionally, the recognition of $80.7 million in revenue in Q2 2003 attributable to prior periods due to corrected accounting treatment for certain derivative contracts also contributed.

Williams is actively pursuing a strategy to bolster liquidity and de-leverage its balance sheet. This involves significant asset sales, with nearly $4 billion in net proceeds expected from asset sales during 2003-2004. Proceeds generated from these sales, along with cash on hand and operational cash flows, are being used to repay maturing debt obligations, including $1.8 billion in notes payable and long-term debt due through Q1 2004. The company also recently issued new debt and refinanced existing obligations.

The company faces significant ongoing risks, including substantial legal and regulatory proceedings, particularly related to its Energy Marketing & Trading segment and its involvement in California's energy markets, which could result in material refunds, penalties, or damages. Additionally, there's exposure to market fluctuations in energy commodity prices and counterparty credit risk in its trading activities. The company's credit rating not being investment grade also necessitates providing additional credit support for certain transactions.

The adoption of EITF Issue No. 02-3, effective January 1, 2003, had a material impact, particularly on the Energy Marketing & Trading segment. It mandated the reporting of revenues and costs from non-derivative energy contracts and certain physically settled derivative contracts on a gross basis, rather than a net basis. This change significantly increased reported revenues and costs. The initial application of this standard resulted in a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, reducing net income by $761.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, primarily due to the reversal of previously fair-valued non-derivative energy contracts.