8-KMaterial Agreements

APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE 8-K Report, Material Agreement (Sep 13, 2006)

Filed September 13, 2006For Securities:AMAT

Summary

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) filed an 8-K on September 13, 2006, to report an amendment to its Employee Stock Incentive Plan. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a change in the grant date for automatic annual stock option grants awarded to non-employee directors. This amendment shifts the grant date from the last business day of the fiscal year to the first business day of the subsequent fiscal year.

Key Highlights

  • 1Amendment to the Applied Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan.
  • 2Change in the grant date for automatic annual stock option grants to non-employee directors.
  • 3New grant date will be the first business day of the fiscal year following the service year.
  • 4Previous grant date was the last business day of the fiscal year.
  • 5The amendment is effective immediately for the fiscal year 2006 grants.
  • 6Fiscal year 2006 grants will be awarded on October 30, 2006, instead of October 27, 2006.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary purpose of this 8-K filing is to inform investors about an amendment to Applied Materials' Employee Stock Incentive Plan concerning the timing of stock option grants to non-employee directors.

Non-employee directors who serve for the entire fiscal year will still receive an annual stock option grant. However, the timing of this grant is now shifted to the beginning of the following fiscal year instead of the end of the current fiscal year.

This amendment primarily affects the timing of stock option awards to directors and is not expected to have a direct, immediate financial impact on the company's reported earnings or financial position beyond the standard accounting for stock-based compensation. The total number of options granted and their value, in theory, remains consistent over time, with the change being purely in the award date.

While not explicitly stated in the filing, companies may adjust grant dates for various reasons, such as aligning with broader compensation review cycles, seeking to avoid potential perceptions of timing grants based on short-term company performance, or for administrative convenience in relation to fiscal year-end reporting.