10-QPeriod: Q3 FY2001

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC Quarterly Report for Q3 Ended Sep 30, 2001

Filed November 14, 2001For Securities:AMD

Summary

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) reported a net loss of $186.9 million for the third quarter of 2001, a significant decline from a net income of $408.6 million in the same quarter of the prior year. Revenue also saw a substantial decrease of 37% year-over-year, from $1.21 billion to $765.9 million, driven by weakness in both the PC processor and memory product segments, exacerbated by aggressive market pricing and industry-wide inventory buildup. The company announced a significant restructuring plan in late September 2001, involving the closure of facilities in Austin, Texas, and workforce reductions of approximately 2,300 employees. This plan resulted in $89.3 million in restructuring charges during the quarter. While the company is investing heavily in its Dresden, Germany fabrication facility (Fab 30) and its joint venture in Japan (FASL), the current financial performance reflects the challenging semiconductor market conditions. Investors should monitor the execution of the restructuring plan and the ramp-up of new products like the Athlon XP for signs of recovery.

Key Highlights

  • 1Reported a net loss of $186.9 million for Q3 2001, compared to a net income of $408.6 million in Q3 2000.
  • 2Net sales decreased 37% year-over-year to $765.9 million in Q3 2001.
  • 3Significant decline in gross margin percentage to 22% in Q3 2001 from 47% in Q3 2000.
  • 4Announced a restructuring plan impacting approximately 2,300 employees and involving facility closures.
  • 5Recorded $89.3 million in restructuring and other special charges in Q3 2001.
  • 6Continued significant capital expenditures for Dresden Fab 30 and FASL joint venture.
  • 7Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased from $1.29 billion at the end of 2000 to $903.5 million at the end of Q3 2001.

Frequently Asked Questions

The decline in revenue and profitability was primarily due to a widespread downturn in the semiconductor industry, particularly in the communications and networking equipment sectors. This led to weaker demand for memory products and increased inventory levels at customers. For PC processors, aggressive market pricing pressures from competitors and a decline in average selling prices also contributed significantly to the reduced revenue and gross margins.

The restructuring plan was announced in response to the continued slowdown in the semiconductor industry and declining revenues. Its primary goals are to reduce costs and enhance the financial performance of AMD's core businesses. The plan involves closing facilities in Austin, Texas, and restructuring operations in Penang, Malaysia, leading to the elimination of approximately 2,300 jobs. AMD expects this plan to result in annualized cost reductions of up to $125 million.

AMD's cash and cash equivalents, along with short-term investments, decreased to $903.5 million as of September 30, 2001, down from $1.29 billion at the end of 2000. Net cash used in investing activities was $466 million in the first nine months of 2001, largely due to capital expenditures of $542 million for facilities like Dresden Fab 30 and Asia manufacturing sites, and $122 million for additional investments in its FASL joint venture. The company believes its current cash flows from operations, combined with available external financing, will be sufficient to fund operations and capital investments for the next 12 months.

Key risks include intense competition, particularly from Intel, in the microprocessor market, which leads to pricing pressures and requires continuous innovation and fast product cycles. The demand for Flash memory products remains weak due to industry conditions and increasing competition. The company faces significant capital requirements for its large-scale manufacturing projects (Dresden Fab 30, FASL JV3), which carry risks related to execution, financing, and potential underutilization. Additionally, the company is exposed to general economic conditions, potential product incompatibilities, and supply chain risks.