Skip to content
AnalystLens

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC 8-K Report, Bylaw Amendment (May 7, 2014)

Reports
Shareholder Matters·Corporate Changes·Exhibits & Filings
Filing Date
Filed May 7, 2014
Period End
May 5, 2014
Security
CDNS
In the record · 2016–202610-K1210-Q328-K98

CDNS filed 12 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 98 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. FY2016 annual report10-K · Feb ’17Feb ’17
  2. Leadership change8-K · May ’19May ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Jul ’21Jul ’21
  4. Material agreement8-K · Sep ’25Sep ’25

Summary

Summary of the 8-K filed May 7, 2014. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) filed an 8-K on May 7, 2014, reporting key corporate governance and shareholder vote outcomes from its Annual Meeting held on May 6, 2014.

The company's Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the company's Bylaws, effective May 5, 2014. These amendments primarily address procedural clarifications for filling board vacancies, particularly in cases of director failure to receive majority votes in uncontested elections, and refine the process for stockholder written consents, including notice requirements, record dates, effectiveness periods, and independent inspector reviews. Furthermore, the filing details the results of several proposals voted on by shareholders at the annual meeting.

All eight director nominees were elected, the Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan was approved, and advisory approval for executive compensation was granted. Additionally, shareholders ratified the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 3, 2015. These outcomes generally reflect strong shareholder support for the company's leadership and compensation practices.

Key Highlights

  1. Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of company Bylaws, effective May 5, 2014.
  2. Bylaw amendments clarify procedures for filling board vacancies and handling stockholder written consents.
  3. All eight nominated directors were elected at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 6, 2014.
  4. Shareholders approved the Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, consolidating previous equity plans.
  5. An advisory resolution to approve executive compensation was approved by stockholders.
  6. KPMG LLP was ratified as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 3, 2015.
  7. The filing includes detailed voting results for director elections, the equity plan, executive compensation, and auditor ratification.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What were the main changes to Cadence's Bylaws?

    The Bylaws were amended and restated to clarify procedures for filling Board vacancies, especially if a director fails to receive a majority vote in an uncontested election. They also revised requirements for stockholder written consents, including notice, record date, effectiveness period, and the use of independent inspectors for validity review.

  2. What were the outcomes of the shareholder votes at the Annual Meeting?

    Shareholders elected all eight nominated directors, approved the Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, provided advisory approval for executive compensation, and ratified the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent auditor for the upcoming fiscal year.

  3. Were there any significant "against" votes or broker non-votes on the proposals?

    While all proposals passed with substantial "For" votes, there were "Against" votes and "Broker Non-Votes" on director elections and the equity incentive plan. The ratification of KPMG LLP received a very high "For" vote with minimal opposition and no broker non-votes, indicating strong confidence in the auditor.

  4. What is the significance of the Bylaw amendments regarding director vacancies?

    These amendments aim to provide clearer and potentially more streamlined processes for addressing situations where a director does not secure majority support in an uncontested election, ensuring the Board composition can be addressed efficiently.