10-KPeriod: FY2005

CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD/CN Annual Report, Year Ended Dec 31, 2005

Filed March 22, 2006For Securities:CP

Summary

This Form 40-F filing for Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and Canadian Pacific Railway Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, primarily serves as an annual report that incorporates by reference their audited financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) from their 2005 Annual Report. The filing confirms the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2005, and reports no material changes in internal controls over financial reporting during the period. It also details the company's robust corporate governance framework, including Codes of Business Ethics and Ethics for Senior Officers, as well as its Corporate Governance Principles and Guidelines, all designed to ensure compliance and ethical conduct. Key financial aspects highlighted include the fees paid to their independent auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, for the years 2005 and 2004, totaling $2.14 million and $1.90 million respectively. These fees cover audit, audit-related, and tax services, with audit-related services showing a notable increase in 2005, partly due to preparations for Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance. The filing also confirms the existence of audit committee financial experts and outlines the rigorous pre-approval policy for services provided by the independent auditor, emphasizing the preservation of auditor independence.

Key Highlights

  • 1The filing incorporates by reference the company's audited financial statements and MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, from their 2005 Annual Report.
  • 2Disclosure controls and procedures were evaluated and found to be effective as of December 31, 2005, with no material changes to internal controls over financial reporting noted.
  • 3Canadian Pacific maintains comprehensive corporate governance policies, including Codes of Business Ethics and Ethics for CEO/Senior Financial Officers, and detailed Corporate Governance Principles and Guidelines.
  • 4Total fees paid to independent auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP increased from $1.90 million in 2004 to $2.14 million in 2005.
  • 5Audit-related fees significantly increased in 2005 ($812,540 vs. $574,900 in 2004), partly due to preparations for Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) Section 404 compliance.
  • 6The company has designated audit committee financial experts and has a strict policy for pre-approving all audit and non-audit services from the independent auditor to maintain independence.

Frequently Asked Questions

This Form 40-F filing for Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and Canadian Pacific Railway Company serves as an annual report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. It primarily incorporates by reference the company's audited financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) from its 2005 Annual Report, along with information on corporate governance, disclosure controls, and auditor fees.

This filing itself does not provide detailed financial statements but references the company's 2005 Annual Report for those. However, it does highlight the fees paid to its independent auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, which totaled $2.14 million in 2005. The increase in audit-related fees, particularly those associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, suggests ongoing efforts to strengthen financial reporting and internal controls.

The company emphasizes strong corporate governance through its Code of Business Ethics, Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, and Corporate Governance Principles and Guidelines. These documents outline standards for directors, officers, and employees concerning conflicts of interest, asset protection, confidentiality, legal compliance, and reporting unethical behavior. They also detail director independence criteria and the functions of various board committees.

Yes, the filing states that an evaluation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures, conducted under the supervision of management including the CEO and CFO, concluded they were effective as of December 31, 2005. Furthermore, no changes occurred in the Registrants' internal control over financial reporting during the period that materially affected or were reasonably likely to materially affect these controls.