Skip to content
AnalystLens

ECOLAB INC. 8-K Report, Shareholder Vote Results (May 6, 2011)

Reports
Shareholder Matters·Other Events·Exhibits & Filings
Filing Date
Filed May 6, 2011
Period End
May 5, 2011
Security
ECL
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K144

ECL filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 144 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · Sep ’16Sep ’16
  2. Leadership change8-K · Apr ’19Apr ’19
  3. Deal closed8-K · Dec ’21Dec ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Aug ’25Aug ’25

Summary

Summary of the 8-K filed May 6, 2011. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Ecolab Inc. (ECL) filed an 8-K on May 5, 2011, reporting the outcomes of its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 5, 2011.

A significant majority of outstanding shares were represented, indicating strong shareholder engagement. Key outcomes include the election of four Class I Directors and the overwhelming ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. Additionally, shareholders approved amendments to the Ecolab Stock Purchase Plan and an advisory vote on executive compensation, with a majority favoring a one-year frequency for future advisory votes.

Further, the company announced Board authorization for an additional share repurchase program of up to 15,000,000 shares of common stock, signaling a commitment to returning value to shareholders. While a shareholder proposal to adopt a policy on the human right to water was not approved, a proposal to eliminate super-majority voting was passed, reflecting a desire for enhanced shareholder rights.

Key Highlights

  1. Election of four Class I Directors (Douglas M. Baker, Jr., Barbara J. Beck, Jerry W. Levin, Robert L. Lumpkins) for a term ending in 2013, with all nominees receiving substantial support from shareholders.
  2. Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2011, receiving overwhelming approval.
  3. Approval of amendments to the Ecolab Stock Purchase Plan.
  4. Advisory vote on executive compensation was approved, with a majority of shareholders voting in favor.
  5. Shareholders favored holding advisory votes on executive compensation every one year.
  6. Board of Directors authorized an additional share repurchase program of up to 15,000,000 shares of common stock.
  7. Shareholder proposal to eliminate super-majority voting was approved, indicating a move towards simpler voting structures.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What were the main outcomes of Ecolab's Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 5, 2011?

    The main outcomes included the election of four Class I Directors, the ratification of the company's independent auditor (PwC), approval of amendments to the Stock Purchase Plan, and an advisory vote on executive compensation. Additionally, a significant decision was the Board's authorization of a new share repurchase program for up to 15 million shares, and the approval of a shareholder proposal to eliminate super-majority voting.

  2. What is the significance of the new share repurchase program?

    The authorization to repurchase up to 15,000,000 additional shares of common stock indicates that Ecolab's Board believes the company's stock is undervalued or aims to return capital to shareholders. This can be viewed positively by investors as it may support the stock price and increase earnings per share.

  3. How did shareholders vote on the advisory proposals related to executive compensation?

    Shareholders approved the advisory vote on the compensation of executives as disclosed in the Proxy Statement. Furthermore, in an advisory vote on the frequency of future executive compensation votes, the majority of shareholders favored an annual frequency (1-Year).

  4. Were there any shareholder proposals that were not approved?

    Yes, a shareholder proposal requesting the Board of Directors to adopt a policy on the human right to water was not approved by the majority of shareholders.