Skip to content
AnalystLens

MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC Annual Report, Year Ended Aug 30, 2012

Filing Date
Filed October 29, 2012
Period End
August 30, 2012
Security
MU
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q348-K171

MU filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 34 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 171 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Deal closed8-K · Dec ’16Dec ’16
  2. FY2019 annual report10-K · Oct ’19Oct ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Jan ’22Jan ’22
  4. Leadership change8-K · Oct ’25Oct ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-K filed October 29, 2012. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Micron Technology, Inc.'s (MU) 2012 10-K filing reveals a challenging year marked by significant price declines in its core DRAM and NAND Flash memory products, leading to a net loss of $1.03 billiona attributable to Micron shareholders.

Despite a 6% decrease in net sales to $8.23 billionb, the company managed to increase NAND Flash sales volume by 30% and DRAM sales volume by 59%, partially offsetting the adverse impact of falling average selling prices. The company continued to invest heavily in research and development, reflecting its strategy to stay competitive in the rapidly evolving semiconductor industry. A significant strategic move during the fiscal year was the agreement to acquire Elpida Memory, Inc., a major DRAM manufacturer, which, if completed, would substantially alter Micron's market position, though it also introduced considerable financial and integration risks.

The company's financial health remains a key concern, with increasing debt levels and ongoing efforts to manage capital expenditures and liquidity in a volatile market. Investors should pay close attention to Micron's ability to successfully integrate potential acquisitions like Elpida, manage its substantial debt, and navigate the highly competitive and cyclical semiconductor memory market. The company's reliance on technological advancements and its ongoing R&D investments are critical for future growth.

The significant price declines in memory products underscore the importance of cost management and operational efficiency. The ongoing litigation with Rambus, while not having a material impact at the time of filing, remains a factor to monitor for potential future liabilities.

Key Highlights

  1. Net loss of $1.03 billion attributable to Micron shareholders for fiscal year 2012, a significant downturn from a net income of $167 million in 2011, driven by falling average selling prices.
  2. Net sales decreased by 6% to $8.23 billion in 2012 compared to $8.79 billion in 2011, reflecting price declines across all segments, though sales volumes increased for key products.
  3. The company entered into a significant agreement to acquire Elpida Memory, Inc., a major DRAM manufacturer, aiming to strengthen its market position, but this acquisition introduced substantial financial and integration risks.
  4. Micron continued to make significant investments in R&D, with expenses increasing to $918 million in 2012, a 16% rise from 2011, indicating a commitment to technological advancement.
  5. DRAM Solutions Group (DSG) experienced a 16% decline in sales and an operating loss of $500 million, largely due to weak demand in the PC market and falling average selling prices.
  6. NAND Solutions Group (NSG) saw a 30% increase in sales, primarily driven by higher volumes, though average selling prices also declined.
  7. The company's financial position showed increased debt levels, with total debt rising to $3.26 billion as of August 30, 2012, compared to $2.00 billion in the prior year.

Follow one dollar

For each $1.00 of revenue in FY2012, Micron Technology Inc lost $0.13.

  1. Revenue$8.23B100.0%
  2. Cost of revenue−$7.27B88.2%
  3. Gross profit$968.0M11.8%
  4. Operating costs−$1.58B19.2%
  5. Operating income−$612.0M7.4%
  6. Interest, other & tax−$420.0M5.1%
  7. Net income−$1.03B12.5%
Computed from 10-KFY2012filed October 29, 2012Computed from this filing’s revenue, gross profit, operating income and net income · right columngrey figure: share of revenue

Financial Statements

FY2012 against FY2011

Line itemFY2012FY2011Change
Revenue$8.23B$8.79B−6.3%
Cost of Revenue$7.27B$7.03B+3.4%
Gross Profit$968.00M$1.76B−44.9%
R&D Expenses$918.00M$791.00M+16.1%
SG&A Expenses$620.00M$592.00M+4.7%
Operating Income-$612.00M$761.00M−180.4%
Interest Expense$179.00M$124.00M+44.4%
Net Income-$1.03B$167.00M−718.0%
EPS (Basic)$-1.04$0.17−711.8%
EPS (Diluted)$-1.04$0.17−711.8%
Shares Outstanding (Basic)991.00M988.00M+0.3%
Shares Outstanding (Diluted)991.00M1.01B−1.6%

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What was Micron's financial performance in fiscal year 2012?

    Micron experienced a challenging fiscal year 2012, reporting a net loss of $1.03 billion attributable to shareholders. Net sales decreased by 6% to $8.23 billion, primarily due to significant declines in the average selling prices of its DRAM and NAND Flash memory products. This performance was impacted by industry-wide pricing pressures and a slowdown in the personal computer market.

  2. What are the key strategic initiatives or significant events mentioned in the filing?

    The most significant event was Micron's agreement to acquire Elpida Memory, Inc., a major Japanese DRAM manufacturer. This potential acquisition, aimed at expanding Micron's scale and market share, also introduced considerable financial and integration risks. Additionally, Micron restructured its IM Flash joint venture with Intel, acquiring Intel's remaining interests in IMFS and assets at the Virginia facility.

  3. What are the major risks and challenges facing Micron Technology?

    Micron faces intense competition in the highly cyclical semiconductor memory market, with significant risks stemming from volatile average selling prices, rapid technological changes, and the capital-intensive nature of manufacturing. The company also faces risks related to its substantial debt levels, the successful integration of acquisitions, potential intellectual property disputes, and global economic conditions that can impact demand for its products.

  4. How did the company's different product segments perform?

    The NAND Solutions Group (NSG) showed growth, with a 30% increase in sales driven by higher volumes, though prices decreased. The DRAM Solutions Group (DSG) saw a significant sales decline of 16% and incurred an operating loss due to weak PC market demand and falling DRAM prices. The Wireless Solutions Group (WSG) sales decreased by 40%, impacted by a decline in NOR Flash sales and pricing pressure. The Embedded Solutions Group (ESG) experienced a modest 5% sales increase.