Skip to content
AnalystLens

MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC Quarterly Report for Q2 Ended Feb 28, 2008

Filing Date
Filed April 8, 2008
Period End
February 28, 2008
Security
MU
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q348-K171

MU filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 34 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 171 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Deal closed8-K · Dec ’16Dec ’16
  2. FY2019 annual report10-K · Oct ’19Oct ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Jan ’22Jan ’22
  4. Leadership change8-K · Oct ’25Oct ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-Q filed April 8, 2008. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Micron Technology, Inc. reported a challenging second quarter for fiscal year 2008, marked by a significant net loss of $777 milliona, or $1.01 per diluted share.

This performance was heavily impacted by a substantial $463 millionb goodwill impairment charge related to the Memory segment, reflecting the ongoing decline in memory product prices and market weakness. Revenue for the quarter was $1.359 billion, down 5% year-over-year, primarily driven by a 4% decrease in Memory sales and a 13% decrease in Imaging sales. The company is navigating a highly competitive semiconductor market characterized by declining average selling prices (ASPs) for its core products, DRAM and NAND Flash.

Despite efforts to reduce manufacturing costs, ASP declines have outpaced cost reductions, leading to negative gross margins (-3% for the quarter). This has also resulted in inventory write-downs totaling $15 millionc for the quarter. Micron is actively pursuing restructuring initiatives to improve efficiency and competitiveness, but these efforts and the company's significant capital expenditures indicate ongoing financial pressures.

Key Highlights

  1. Significant net loss of $777 million ($1.01/share) for the quarter.
  2. Recorded a $463 million goodwill impairment charge for the Memory segment due to market weakness and declining prices.
  3. Total net sales decreased 5% year-over-year to $1.359 billion.
  4. Gross margin turned negative at -3%, primarily driven by declining memory product ASPs and shifts in product mix.
  5. Inventory write-downs of $15 million were recorded due to falling market values of memory products.
  6. Continued significant capital expenditures are planned, with 2008 estimates between $2.5 billion and $3.0 billion, largely for NAND operations.
  7. Ongoing legal proceedings and investigations, particularly antitrust matters, pose a significant risk and potential financial liability.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary reason for the large net loss in this quarter?

    The primary driver of the significant net loss of $777 million was a $463 million goodwill impairment charge recognized for the Memory segment. This reflects the company's assessment that the Memory segment's fair value was below its carrying value, largely due to sustained declines in memory product prices and market weakness.

  2. How are declining average selling prices (ASPs) impacting Micron's profitability?

    Declining ASPs for DRAM and NAND Flash products are severely impacting profitability. This is evident in the negative gross margin of -3% for the quarter. The company is struggling to reduce per-megabit manufacturing costs at a pace that offsets the rapid decline in selling prices, leading to margin erosion and inventory write-downs.

  3. What is the outlook for Micron's NAND Flash business?

    Micron is significantly increasing its NAND Flash production and sales, with substantial investments in joint ventures with Intel and capital expenditures. While production volume is increasing, the strategy involves higher exposure to volatile ASPs and significant capital requirements. The company is also party to a long-term supply agreement with Apple at contractually determined prices.

  4. What are the most significant risks facing Micron based on this report?

    Key risks include the continued volatility and decline of semiconductor memory prices, the inability to reduce manufacturing costs sufficiently to offset ASP declines, intense competition in the industry, significant ongoing capital expenditures, potential financial impact from numerous ongoing legal proceedings (especially antitrust-related), and risks associated with new product development and international operations.