Skip to content
AnalystLens

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP Quarterly Report for Q2 Ended Jun 30, 2004

Filing Date
Filed July 30, 2004
Period End
June 30, 2004
Security
NSC
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K193

NSC filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 193 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · Aug ’17Aug ’17
  2. Material agreement8-K · Nov ’19Nov ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Dec ’21Dec ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Sep ’25Sep ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-Q filed July 30, 2004. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) reported a strong second quarter for 2004, with net income rising to $213 milliona, a significant increase from $137 million in the same period last year.

This growth was driven by an 11% increase in railway operating revenues, reaching $1.8 billionb, and a more modest 4% increase in operating expenses. The company benefited from higher traffic volumes across its key segments, particularly in General Merchandise and Intermodal, and improved average revenue per unit, partly due to fuel surcharges and a favorable traffic mix.

For the first six months of 2004, net income was $371 millionc, up from $346 million in 2003, reflecting a 10% rise in revenues. The company also highlighted progress in its Conrail reorganization efforts and effective management of diesel fuel costs through its hedging program, which helped mitigate the impact of rising fuel prices.

Key Highlights

  1. Net income increased significantly to $213 million for Q2 2004, up from $137 million in Q2 2003, driven by higher revenues and controlled expenses.
  2. Railway operating revenues grew 11% to $1.8 billion in Q2 2004, fueled by a 10% increase in traffic volume and higher average revenue per unit.
  3. General Merchandise and Intermodal segments showed robust revenue growth, with Intermodal up 21% driven by strong trailer and container volume.
  4. Operating expenses increased by a more modest 4%, indicating improved operating leverage as carloads rose 8%.
  5. The company's diesel fuel hedging program provided significant benefits, decreasing diesel fuel expenses by $26 million in Q2 2004.
  6. Progress was noted on the Conrail corporate reorganization, with SEC registration statements becoming effective in July 2004.
  7. The company's debt-to-total capitalization ratio remained healthy at 48.2% as of June 30, 2004.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What was the primary driver of Norfolk Southern's increased profitability in the second quarter of 2004?

    The primary driver of increased profitability was a significant rise in railway operating revenues, up 11% to $1.8 billion, due to higher traffic volumes and increased average revenue per unit. This revenue growth outpaced the slower 4% increase in railway operating expenses, leading to a substantial improvement in income from railway operations.

  2. How did Norfolk Southern manage rising diesel fuel costs?

    Norfolk Southern employed a diesel fuel hedging program using swaps to lock in purchase prices for a significant portion of its consumption. This program provided substantial benefits, reducing diesel fuel expenses by $26 million in the second quarter of 2004 and mitigating the impact of rising fuel prices on operating margins.

  3. What is the status of the Conrail reorganization?

    The Conrail corporate reorganization is progressing. Key steps achieved include an IRS ruling in 2003 that the reorganization would qualify as a tax-free distribution, STB authorization in 2003 subject to certain conditions, and the effectiveness of registration statements on Form S-4 with the SEC in July 2004. The company is actively pursuing an exchange offer for Conrail's unsecured debt.

  4. Are there any significant risks or contingencies that investors should be aware of?

    Investors should be aware of ongoing lawsuits and claims related to railroad operations, for which liabilities are accrued when probable and estimable. Additionally, the company is subject to environmental laws and regulations, with liabilities for environmental exposures recorded at $23 million as of June 30, 2004, though management believes these will not have a material adverse effect. Fluctuations in diesel fuel prices and interest rates are managed through hedging activities.