Skip to content
AnalystLens

NVIDIA CORP 8-K Report, Shareholder Vote Results (May 29, 2019)

Reports
Shareholder Matters
Filing Date
Filed May 29, 2019
Period End
May 22, 2019
Security
NVDA
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K110

NVDA filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 110 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Leadership change8-K · May ’18May ’18
  2. Deal closed8-K · Jul ’20Jul ’20
  3. Leadership change8-K · Jun ’22Jun ’22
  4. Material agreement8-K · Aug ’26Aug ’26

Summary

Summary of the 8-K filed May 29, 2019. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) filed an 8-K report detailing the outcomes of its 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 22, 2019.

The report indicates strong support for the company's slate of twelve directors, all of whom were approved for a one-year term. Additionally, stockholders provided advisory approval for the compensation of named executive officers and ratified the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered accounting firm for the upcoming fiscal year.

However, a key point for investors to note is the rejection of a proposal to amend and restate the Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements for director removal without cause. While most proposals passed with overwhelming support, this specific governance-related proposal did not receive stockholder approval, suggesting a preference among a segment of shareholders for the existing supermajority provisions.

Key Highlights

  1. All twelve NVIDIA directors were re-elected to serve until the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, receiving substantial 'For' votes.
  2. Stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of NVIDIA's named executive officers.
  3. The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered accounting firm for fiscal year ending January 26, 2020, was ratified.
  4. A proposal to eliminate supermajority voting requirements for director removal without cause was not approved by stockholders.
  5. The company experienced a significant number of broker non-votes (over 107 million) across several director elections and executive compensation proposals.
  6. While most proposals showed overwhelming support, the failure to pass the supermajority voting amendment indicates a division on certain corporate governance matters.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What were the key outcomes of NVIDIA's 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?

    The 2019 Annual Meeting saw the re-election of all twelve directors, advisory approval of executive compensation, and ratification of the independent auditor. However, a proposal to remove supermajority voting requirements for director removal without cause was not approved.

  2. Did all management proposals receive strong shareholder support?

    Most management proposals, including director elections and auditor ratification, received very strong support. However, the proposal to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting for director removal without cause was not approved.

  3. What is the significance of the broker non-votes?

    Broker non-votes represent shares held by brokers that did not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner and therefore could not be voted on specific proposals (excluding the auditor ratification). A high number of broker non-votes, as seen in the director elections and executive compensation votes, can indicate a large portion of shares were held in 'street name' and their voting impact was limited on those specific items.

  4. What does it mean that executive compensation was approved 'on an advisory basis'?

    An advisory vote on executive compensation, often referred to as a 'Say-on-Pay' vote, allows shareholders to express their opinion on the compensation of the company's top executives. While the vote is non-binding, it provides valuable feedback to the board and compensation committee regarding shareholder sentiment on executive pay practices.