Skip to content
AnalystLens

UNION PACIFIC CORP Quarterly Report for Q2 Ended Jun 30, 2001

Filing Date
Filed August 14, 2001
Period End
June 30, 2001
Security
UNP
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K174

UNP filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 174 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Restructuring8-K · Aug ’17Aug ’17
  2. Leadership change8-K · Sep ’19Sep ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Sep ’21Sep ’21
  4. Material agreement8-K · Jul ’25Jul ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-Q filed August 14, 2001. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) reported its financial results for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001.

While consolidated net income remained relatively stable year-over-year for the quarter ($243 milliona vs. $244 million), it saw a slight decrease for the six-month period ($424 million vs. $429 million). This performance was primarily driven by increased operating revenues, which were partially offset by higher operating expenses, notably fuel, wages, and benefits. The company's core rail segment experienced revenue growth, particularly in energy and agricultural commodities, but faced challenges from a slowdown in industrial products and intermodal traffic.

Despite these pressures, Union Pacific demonstrated effective cost management and productivity improvements, as evidenced by a stable or slightly improved operating ratio in some areas and a continued focus on operational efficiency. Key financial developments include stable cash flow from operations, despite a planned workforce reduction impacting the current period, and consistent capital investment in the rail network. The company also refinanced debt and maintained access to substantial revolving credit facilities, indicating a solid liquidity position.

Investors should note the company's ongoing efforts to integrate operations, manage costs associated with fuel and labor, and navigate a moderating economic environment. The report also highlights the adoption of new accounting standards, which management anticipates will have a limited immediate financial impact.

Key Highlights

  1. Consolidated Net Income for the three months ended June 30, 2001, was $243 million, a slight decrease from $244 million in the prior year period. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, Net Income was $424 million, down from $429 million in the prior year.
  2. Operating Revenues increased by 1% to $2,998 million for the three-month period and by 1% to $5,941 million for the six-month period, driven by higher energy and agricultural commodity revenues at the Railroad and increased revenue at Overnite.
  3. Operating Expenses increased by 3% for both the three-month ($2,504 million) and six-month ($5,008 million) periods, primarily due to higher fuel prices, rent expense, and salaries, wages, and employee benefits.
  4. The Rail segment experienced a 1% increase in operating revenues but a 3% increase in operating expenses for both periods, leading to a decrease in operating income for the quarter by 9% ($491 million) and for the six months by 6% ($940 million).
  5. Cash provided by operating activities was $843 million for the first six months of 2001, a decrease from $1,034 million in the prior year, partly due to cash payments for workforce reductions.
  6. Capital investments for the six months ended June 30, 2001, were $792 million, a slight decrease from $817 million in the prior year period.
  7. Union Pacific maintained access to $2.0 billion in revolving credit facilities as of June 30, 2001, with a significant portion expiring in 2005.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What was Union Pacific's net income performance for the reported periods?

    For the three months ended June 30, 2001, Union Pacific reported a net income of $243 million ($0.95 per diluted share), a slight decrease from $244 million ($0.96 per diluted share) in the same period of 2000. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, net income was $424 million ($1.67 per diluted share), down from $429 million ($1.70 per diluted share) in the comparable period of 2000. This decrease was attributed to higher operating expenses, particularly fuel and wage costs, which were not fully offset by revenue growth and productivity improvements.

  2. How did operating revenues and expenses change, and what were the main drivers?

    Consolidated operating revenues saw a modest increase of 1% for both the three-month ($2,998 million) and six-month ($5,941 million) periods ended June 30, 2001, compared to 2000. This growth was primarily driven by higher revenues in the energy and agricultural sectors of the rail business and increased revenue from the trucking segment (Overnite). However, operating expenses also increased by 3% to $2,504 million for the quarter and $5,008 million for the six months. Key drivers for higher expenses included increased fuel prices, higher equipment rents, and rising salaries, wages, and employee benefits. Productivity improvements and workforce reductions partially mitigated these cost increases.

  3. What is the company's financial position regarding debt and liquidity?

    As of June 30, 2001, Union Pacific had $2.0 billion in revolving credit facilities, with $1.0 billion maturing in March 2002 and the remaining $1.0 billion in 2005, indicating strong liquidity. The ratio of debt to total capital employed was 44.7%, which is a stable leverage position. Cash provided by operating activities was $843 million for the first six months of 2001, down from the previous year but still substantial, reflecting the company's ability to generate cash flow.

  4. Are there any significant legal or environmental matters impacting the company?

    The company is involved in shareholder litigation regarding Overnite's labor relations, which the company believes to be without merit and intends to defend vigorously. Additionally, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is pursuing bargaining order remedies in several cases involving Overnite. On the environmental front, the State of Illinois filed a complaint against the Railroad seeking penalties for an alleged violation of air pollution laws related to a styrene release in 1997, which the Railroad is also defending. The company does not expect these known matters to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.