10-QPeriod: Q2 FY2005

NVIDIA CORP Quarterly Report for Q2 Ended Jul 25, 2004

Filed August 19, 2004For Securities:NVDA

Summary

NVIDIA Corporation's fiscal second quarter 2005 report for the period ending July 25, 2004, indicates a significant decline in profitability compared to the prior year. Net income for the quarter fell to $5.1 million from $24.1 million in the same period last year, and year-to-date net income decreased to $26.5 million from $43.9 million. This downturn is primarily driven by a substantial increase in research and development (R&D) and sales, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses, which grew by 30% and 28% respectively for the six-month period. Despite the lower net income, the company maintained a strong balance sheet with total assets of $1.48 billion and substantial cash and marketable securities totaling $613.3 million. Revenue showed a slight decrease year-over-year for the quarter, but increased for the six-month period. The company's gross profit margin saw a moderate improvement. However, the increased operating expenses significantly impacted operating income, which plummeted from $24.6 million to $3.8 million for the quarter. Investors should closely monitor the company's ability to control expense growth and translate its investments in R&D into future revenue and profitability.

Key Highlights

  • 1Net income for Q2 FY05 was $5.1 million, a substantial decrease from $24.1 million in Q2 FY04.
  • 2Year-to-date net income declined to $26.5 million from $43.9 million in the prior year.
  • 3Revenue for the quarter was $456.1 million, a slight decrease from $459.8 million in Q2 FY04, but revenue for the six-month period increased to $928.0 million from $864.8 million.
  • 4Operating expenses saw significant increases, with R&D up 30% and SG&A up 28% for the six-month period, impacting profitability.
  • 5Gross profit margin improved slightly to 30.7% in Q2 FY05 from 28.3% in Q2 FY04.
  • 6The company maintained a strong liquidity position with cash and cash equivalents of $180.6 million and marketable securities of $432.7 million, totaling $613.3 million.
  • 7Basic net income per share for the quarter decreased to $0.03 from $0.15 in the prior year.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary driver behind the significant drop in net income is a substantial increase in operating expenses, particularly in research and development (R&D) and sales, general, and administrative (SG&A) costs. For the six-month period ended July 25, 2004, R&D expenses increased by approximately 30% and SG&A expenses increased by approximately 28% compared to the same period last year. This surge in expenses outpaced revenue growth, leading to a sharp decline in operating income and, consequently, net income.

For the three months ended July 25, 2004, NVIDIA reported revenue of $456.1 million, a slight decrease compared to $459.8 million in the same quarter of the prior fiscal year. However, on a year-to-date basis, revenue saw an increase, rising to $928.0 million for the six months ended July 25, 2004, up from $864.8 million in the corresponding period last year. This indicates a mixed revenue performance with a decline in the most recent quarter but growth over the first half of the fiscal year.

NVIDIA maintains a strong financial position. As of July 25, 2004, the company had $180.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and $432.7 million in marketable securities, totaling $613.3 million in liquid assets. Total assets stood at $1.48 billion. While net income has decreased, the company's liquidity remains robust, suggesting it has sufficient resources to fund operations and potential investments.

NVIDIA uses the intrinsic value method, as prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, to account for stock-based employee compensation. Under this method, compensation expense is recognized only when the fair value of the stock on the grant date exceeds the exercise price. However, the company also provides pro forma disclosures based on the fair value method (SFAS No. 123). For the three months ended July 25, 2004, the reported net income was $5.1 million, but the pro forma net income was a loss of $16.3 million, highlighting a significant difference due to stock-based compensation accounting. For the six-month period, reported net income was $26.5 million, while pro forma net income was a loss of $15.4 million.