Skip to content
AnalystLens

RTX Annual Report, Year Ended Dec 31, 1997

Filing Date
Filed February 17, 1998
Period End
December 31, 1997
Security
RTX
In the record · 2016–202610-K1210-Q338-K139

RTX filed 12 annual reports (10-K), 33 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 139 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Deal closed8-K · Jan ’19Jan ’19
  2. Leadership change8-K · Mar ’21Mar ’21
  3. Leadership change8-K · Feb ’23Feb ’23
  4. FY2024 annual report10-K · Feb ’25Feb ’25

01—Abstract

Summary

Summary of the 10-K filed February 17, 1998. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

United Technologies Corporation (the filing refers to the company as the Corporation; the ticker in the request is RTX, which is the current name of this company's successor, RTX Corp, so this report covers the 1997 fiscal year of what was then UTC) reported 1997 revenues of $24.7 billiona, up 5% from $23.5 billion in 1996, with net income rising 18% to $1.07 billion and diluted EPS of $4.21 versus $3.48.

Growth was led by Pratt & Whitney, where revenues rose 19% to $7.4 billionb and segment operating profit climbed 28% to $816 million on strong aftermarket results. Carrier also improved, with operating profit up 9%, helped by acquisitions of Ardco and Tyler Refrigeration, while Otis and UT Automotive faced weaker results from currency translation, Asian slowdown, and lower volumes. Otis and UT Automotive operating profits fell 11% and 12%, respectively.

Balance sheet and cash generation were solid: operating cash flow was $2.13 billion, total debt declined to $1.6 billionc, and debt-to-capitalization improved to 28% from 29%. The company repurchased $849 million of common stock in 1997, up sharply from $459 million in 1996, and paid dividends of $1.24 per share. Shareowners' equity fell to $4.07 billion from $4.31 billion, largely because of the buyback program and currency translation losses.

Investors should note several risk factors. Government contracting exposure remains significant, with a $260.3 milliond contract damages claim from the Department of Defense relating to Pratt & Whitney accounting practices, a False Claims Act case against Sikorsky, and several qui tam suits.

Management believes none will have a material adverse effect, though Asia Pacific economic weakness and dependence on Ford for UTA revenues (38%) are notable concentration and cyclical risks. Backlog totaled $15.7 billion across segments at year-end 1997, with Pratt & Whitney's $8.3 billion the largest component.

02—Key points

Key Highlights

  1. Revenues grew 5% to $24.7 billion in 1997; net income rose 18% to $1.07 billion and diluted EPS reached $4.21 (up from $3.48).
  2. Pratt & Whitney was the standout performer: revenues up 19% to $7.4 billion, operating profit up 28% to $816 million, and an 11.0% operating margin.
  3. Segment operating profit reached $2.17 billion, with Carrier (+9%) and Flight Systems (+22%) also improving while Otis (-11%) and UT Automotive (-12%) declined.
  4. Share repurchases of $849 million (11.2 million shares) more than doubled from 1996, and dividends rose to $1.24 per share from $1.10.
  5. Total debt fell to $1.6 billion, debt-to-capitalization improved to 28%, and operating cash flow was steady at $2.13 billion.
  6. Government legal exposure is material: a $260.3 million DoD contract damages claim against Pratt & Whitney, a False Claims Act suit against Sikorsky, and multiple qui tam actions, though management views none as materially adverse.
  7. Combined backlog of about $15.7 billion at year-end 1997, with roughly $6.6 billion expected to convert to 1998 sales across segments.

03—Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. How did the company's profitability change in 1997?

    Net income increased 18% to $1,072 million from $906 million, and diluted EPS rose to $4.21 from $3.48. Gross margin was roughly flat at 23.9%, while SG&A fell to 11.9% of sales from 12.3%, and the effective tax rate declined to 32.5% from 33.5%.

  2. Which business segments drove growth and which lagged?

    Pratt & Whitney led growth, with revenues up 19% on higher aftermarket and new engine volumes. Carrier and Flight Systems also improved. Otis and UT Automotive lagged due to currency translation, weak Asia Pacific economies, lower automotive volumes, and a plant closure provision.

  3. How exposed is the company to government contracting risk?

    U.S. Government sales were $3.3 billion, or 14% of total sales. The company faces a DoD claim of $260.3 million plus interest against Pratt & Whitney over accounting practices, and a Sikorsky False Claims Act case seeking treble damages. Management believes these will not have a material adverse effect, but a finding of wrongdoing could lead to suspension or debarment from government contracts.

  4. How is the company returning capital to shareholders and managing its balance sheet?

    The company repurchased $849 million of common stock in 1997 and paid $291 million in common dividends. Total debt declined to $1.6 billion, net debt rose to $860 million from $658 million because cash fell, and shareowners' equity declined to $4.07 billion due to buybacks and currency translation losses.

  5. What international and concentration risks should investors consider?

    International revenues were 57% of the total. Otis earned 83% of its revenue outside the U.S., and Asia Pacific revenues fell to $2.95 billion from $3.04 billion amid regional economic weakness. UT Automotive depends on Ford for 38% of its revenue, and certain raw materials, such as cobalt and chromium, come from single or limited foreign sources.

04—Continue

← View all 10-K filings