Skip to content
AnalystLens

Synopsys 8-K Report, Financial Results (Sep 9, 2025)

Reports
Earnings & Results·Exhibits & Filings
Filing Date
Filed September 9, 2025
Period End
September 9, 2025
Security
SNPS
In the record · 2016–202610-K1010-Q338-K142

SNPS filed 10 annual reports (10-K), 33 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 142 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · Nov ’16Nov ’16
  2. Leadership change8-K · May ’21May ’21
  3. Leadership change8-K · Apr ’23Apr ’23
  4. Restructuring8-K · Aug ’26Aug ’26

Summary

Summary of the 8-K filed September 9, 2025. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Synopsys reported fiscal Q3 2025 (quarter ended July 31, 2025) revenue of $1.740 billiona, up 14% year-over-year from $1.526 billion, with the first full quarter consolidating the Ansys acquisition, which closed July 17, 2025.

GAAP diluted EPS was $1.50b, down from $2.73 a year earlier, while non-GAAP diluted EPS was $3.39 versus $3.43. Management said Ansys results were not material to the quarter, and the headline growth was driven by the acquisition rather than organic expansion. Segment performance was uneven: Design Automation revenue rose about 23% to $1.312 billion with adjusted operating margin of 44.5%, while Design IP revenue fell about 8% to $427.6 million and adjusted operating margin compressed sharply to 20.1% from 36.7%.

The CEO described IP as underperforming expectations and said the company is taking action to strengthen its competitive position. The company guided fiscal Q4 2025 revenue to $2.230c–$2.260 billion and full-year FY2025 revenue to $7.030–$7.060 billion, and CFO Shelagh Glaser said management is taking a more conservative view of Q4. Full-year non-GAAP EPS guidance of $12.76–$12.80 and GAAP EPS of $5.03–$5.16 were provided, and the company reiterated expected free cash flow of roughly $950 million.

The fiscal year-end is being changed to October 31 from the prior 52/53-week convention, shifting the calendar by eight fewer days in FY2025, and guidance assumes no further export-control or Entity List changes. The balance sheet changed materially. Total assets rose to $48.2 billiond from $13.1 billion at fiscal year-end 2024, driven by roughly $26.9 billion of goodwill and $13.1 billion of intangibles, while long-term debt rose to $14.3 billion from essentially zero.

Cash and short-term investments declined to $2.59 billion from $4.05 billion, reflecting the roughly $16.7 billion of acquisition cash outflow. The filing also notes pending divestitures of the Optical Solutions Group and the Ansys PowerArtist RTL business to Keysight Technologies. This 8-K furnishes the earnings press release under Item 2.02 and is not deemed filed under Section 18.

Key Highlights

  1. Q3 FY2025 revenue of $1.740B rose 14% YoY, reflecting the July 17, 2025 Ansys acquisition close, though management said Ansys contributed an immaterial amount to quarterly results.
  2. GAAP diluted EPS fell to $1.50 from $2.73, while non-GAAP diluted EPS was $3.39 versus $3.43, as acquisition-related amortization and stock-based compensation rose sharply.
  3. Design IP weakness: segment revenue fell about 8% to $427.6M and adjusted operating margin dropped to 20.1% from 36.7%, prompting management to announce actions to strengthen the IP business.
  4. Design Automation was the growth engine, with revenue up about 23% to $1.312B and adjusted operating margin of 44.5%.
  5. FY2025 revenue guidance of $7.030–$7.060B and non-GAAP EPS of $12.76–$12.80 were issued, with Q4 guidance described by the CFO as more conservative.
  6. Balance sheet transformed: total assets reached $48.2B, goodwill $26.9B, and long-term debt $14.3B, versus $13.1B of assets and minimal debt at FY2024 year-end.
  7. Fiscal year-end is shifting to October 31 from a 52/53-week calendar, reducing FY2025 by eight days and affecting period comparability.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Why did GAAP EPS decline so sharply despite 14% revenue growth?

    GAAP net income fell to $242.5M from $425.9M, largely because of higher operating costs tied to the Ansys deal. Amortization of acquired intangibles rose to $74.9M from $17.4M, stock-based compensation increased to $267.7M from $164.0M, and acquisition-related items reached $120.0M. Interest expense also jumped to $146.5M from $11.7M after the debt-financed acquisition, partly offset by higher other income.

  2. What is driving the weakness in the Design IP segment?

    Design IP revenue declined to $427.6M from $463.1M, and adjusted operating income fell to $86.0M from $169.7M. Management attributed the shortfall to underperformance in the IP business and said it is reallocating resources toward higher-growth opportunities, which may include workforce actions. Investors should watch whether these measures stabilize IP margins in coming quarters.

  3. What does the updated guidance imply for the fourth quarter?

    Q4 FY2025 revenue guidance is $2.230–$2.260B and non-GAAP EPS is $2.76–$2.80, with GAAP EPS guided to a loss of $(0.27) to $(0.16). The CFO said the company is taking a more conservative view of Q4, and full-year non-GAAP EPS guidance of $12.76–$12.80 implies a materially weaker finish relative to the first nine months.

  4. How has Synopsys's capital structure changed after the Ansys acquisition?

    Long-term debt rose to $14.3B from about $16K at fiscal year-end 2024, after the company raised roughly $14.3B of debt and paid about $16.7B in net cash for acquisitions. Shares outstanding increased to 185.5M from 154.1M, reflecting shares issued in the transaction. Cash and short-term investments fell to $2.59B, and leverage will be a key focus for investors going forward.

  5. Are the Ansys results and the fiscal year change affecting comparability?

    Yes. Management stated Ansys results were not material to Q3 or the nine-month period, so reported growth mostly reflects the period from July 17 onward. The fiscal year is moving to a calendar-month-end basis (October 31), which removes eight days from FY2025 compared with FY2024 and shortens the first half while lengthening the second. Year-over-year comparisons should be read with these adjustments in mind.