Skip to content
AnalystLens

Cboe Global Markets, Inc. 8-K Report, Shareholder Vote Results (May 27, 2015)

Reports
Shareholder Matters
Filing Date
Filed May 27, 2015
Period End
May 21, 2015
Security
CBOE
In the record · 2016–202610-K1110-Q328-K123

CBOE filed 11 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 123 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. Material agreement8-K · Jun ’17Jun ’17
  2. Auditor change8-K · Nov ’19Nov ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Sep ’21Sep ’21
  4. Leadership change8-K · Jul ’25Jul ’25

Summary

Summary of the 8-K filed May 27, 2015. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

This 8-K filing from Cboe Global Markets, Inc. details the outcomes of its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 21, 2015.

Key outcomes include the election of all director nominees to the Board of Directors, with all nominees receiving substantial support from shareholders. Additionally, shareholders approved the company's executive compensation in a non-binding advisory vote and ratified the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2015. However, a significant proposal to remove the size range for the Board of Directors was not approved by a substantial margin.

Another proposal for non-substantive amendments to the company's Certificate of Incorporation was approved. This filing provides investors with transparency on corporate governance decisions and shareholder sentiment on key matters.

Key Highlights

  1. All director nominees were successfully elected to the Cboe Global Markets Board of Directors, indicating shareholder confidence in the current leadership.
  2. Shareholders approved the executive compensation for named executive officers via a non-binding advisory vote.
  3. Deloitte & Touche LLP was ratified as the company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2015.
  4. A proposal to remove the specified size range for the Board of Directors (minimum 11, maximum 23) was rejected by a significant majority of shareholders.
  5. An amendment to the company's Certificate of Incorporation for non-substantive changes was approved.
  6. The voting results demonstrate a clear preference for maintaining the existing structure for board size, while supporting executive compensation and auditor ratification.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What were the main outcomes of the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?

    The main outcomes were the election of all director nominees, the approval of executive compensation (non-binding), the ratification of the independent auditor, and the rejection of a proposal to remove the size range for the Board of Directors. A proposal for non-substantive amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation was also approved.

  2. Why was the proposal to remove the Board of Directors' size range not approved?

    The filing does not provide specific reasons for the shareholders' rejection of the proposal to remove the Board of Directors' size range. However, the voting results indicate a strong preference among shareholders to maintain the existing flexibility within the defined range (not less than 11 and not more than 23 directors).

  3. What is the significance of the broker non-votes?

    Broker non-votes occur when a broker holding shares in 'street name' for a client does not receive voting instructions from the client for a particular proposal. These votes are not counted as votes cast 'for' or 'against' a proposal. The consistent high number of broker non-votes (15,725,972) across most proposals, particularly director elections, suggests a significant portion of shares are held in street name and that many beneficial owners did not provide specific voting instructions.

  4. What does the approval of executive compensation mean?

    The approval of executive compensation by a vote of 56,351,499 shares for the proposal signifies shareholder support for the compensation practices outlined for the company's named executive officers. However, it's important to note that this is a non-binding advisory resolution, meaning the Board of Directors is not legally obligated to follow the vote's outcome, but it is expected to consider shareholder sentiment.