01—Abstract
Summary
Summary of the 10-K filed September 1, 1994. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) reported a record fiscal 1994 (year ended June 30, 1994), with revenue of $2,469 milliona, up 11% from $2,223 million in fiscal 1993, and net earnings before two minor accounting changes of $334 million, up 14%.
Earnings per share rose 14% to $2.37b (net $2.34 after a $0.03 charge from adopting FASB Statements 109 and 112). Growth was broad-based: Employer Services (58% of revenue) grew 9%, Brokerage Services (25%) grew 20% on strong Wall Street volumes, and Dealer Services (14%) grew 22% on robust auto sales. Pretax margin improved to 18.1% from 17.4%, reflecting automation and productivity gains, and return on equity was 21%.
The company marked its 33rd consecutive year of double-digit EPS growth and management guided to double-digit revenue and EPS growth again in fiscal 1995. The balance sheet remains very conservative. Cash and marketable securities exceeded $1.06 billionc, shareholders' equity was $1.69 billion, and the long-term debt-to-equity ratio was about 22%, driven mainly by $319 million (accreted value) of zero-coupon convertible notes due 2012.
Operating cash flow rose 30% to $509 million, while capital expenditures increased to $111 milliond and systems development spending to $161 million. Management repurchased about 2.6 million shares at an average of roughly $50 and raised the annual dividend 15% to $0.60, its twentieth consecutive annual increase. Investors should note several points beyond the headline growth.
Brokerage and Dealer growth were partly cyclical, tied to trading volumes and auto sales, and the company acknowledged that acquisitions contributed meaningfully to revenue growth. Employer Services growth slowed to 9% from 17%, lapping the 1992 Bank of America payroll acquisition. The company also disclosed that it does not produce standalone profitability by business unit, which limits segment-level analysis.
Collected but unremitted payroll tax funds averaged about $2.8 billion, providing significant float income that is sensitive to interest rates. Litigation was reported as none.
02—Key points
Key Highlights
- Record fiscal 1994 revenue of $2.47 billion (up 11%) and net earnings before accounting changes of $334 million (up 14%); EPS of $2.37, the 33rd consecutive year of double-digit EPS growth
- Employer Services (58% of revenue) grew 9% to $1.42 billion with pretax margin of about 27%; serves roughly 275,000 employers and 17 million U.S. workers
- Brokerage Services grew 20% to $606 million with pretax margin near 16%, aided by strong trading volumes; ADP processes about 20% of NYSE transactions
- Dealer Services grew 22% to $334 million, serving over 9,500 auto and truck dealers in North America and Europe, with operating margins near 20%
- Balance sheet strength: cash and marketable securities above $1.06 billion, shareholders' equity of $1.69 billion, return on equity of 21%, and long-term debt-to-equity of about 22%
- Operating cash flow up 30% to $509 million; company repurchased about 2.6 million shares at roughly $50 and raised its annual dividend 15% to $0.60
- Acquisitions (Peachtree Software, The Application Group, National BioSystems) support expansion into client-site payroll and claims-related markets; the Application Group acquisition was agreed but not yet completed
03—Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much of ADP's fiscal 1994 growth came from acquisitions rather than organic expansion?
The filing indicates that acquisitions contributed meaningfully, particularly in Brokerage Services, where management said revenue growth would have been roughly half as much in both 1993 and 1994 without the February 1993 and February 1992 acquisitions. Consolidated growth was attributed mainly to client base expansion and new products, with relatively minor contributions from price increases. The company did not quantify the total acquisition contribution for fiscal 1994, and the $81 million of acquisitions made that year were described as not material to the financial statements.
Are Brokerage and Dealer Services growth rates sustainable?
Partly, according to the filing. Brokerage benefited from improved Wall Street trading volumes that followed the 1987 crash and continued through 1993 and 1994, so a downturn in trading activity could slow growth. Dealer Services benefited from robust auto industry sales and new product introductions. Management expects double-digit revenue and EPS growth in fiscal 1995, but the filing does not provide a formal forecast for each segment.
What is the risk profile of ADP's float income from payroll tax services?
ADP collects payroll taxes from about 210,000 clients and holds the funds until remittance, investing them mainly in AA-rated or better municipal instruments. Average collected but unremitted funds were about $2.8 billion in fiscal 1994, and the year-end balance was $3.7 billion. This float generates interest income that depends on short-term rates and on the timing of tax collections, which vary significantly during the year. The company also absorbs regulatory penalties and interest, so a compliance failure could create direct costs.
What does the zero-coupon convertible debt mean for ADP's capital structure?
ADP issued $805 million face value of zero-coupon convertible subordinated notes in February 1992, due in 2012, with a 5.25% yield to maturity. The carrying value was $319 million at June 30, 1994, and the quoted market price was about $322 million. The notes are convertible into roughly 5.2 million common shares, are callable after February 1996, and carry holder put dates in 1997, 2002 and 2007. Because there is no cash coupon, the debt does not require current interest payments, but dilution and eventual redemption are long-term considerations.
Is ADP exposed to significant legal or competitive risks?
The filing reports no legal proceedings and no matters submitted to a shareholder vote. Management states that ADP is among the largest independent computing services companies in the U.S., that no competitor is dominant, and that there are no material negative factors affecting its competitive position. The filing does not provide a detailed risk factor discussion, and the competitive claims are management's own characterization rather than independently verified industry data.
04—Continue