Skip to content
AnalystLens

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC Annual Report, Year Ended Dec 28, 1996

Filing Date
Filed March 21, 1997
Period End
December 28, 1996
Security
CDNS
In the record · 2016–202610-K1210-Q328-K98

CDNS filed 12 annual reports (10-K), 32 quarterly reports (10-Q) and 98 current reports (8-K) between 2016 and 2026.

  1. FY2016 annual report10-K · Feb ’17Feb ’17
  2. Leadership change8-K · May ’19May ’19
  3. Leadership change8-K · Jul ’21Jul ’21
  4. Material agreement8-K · Sep ’25Sep ’25

Summary

Summary of the 10-K filed March 21, 1997. Cited figures are marked; the original filing is the authoritative source.

Cadence Design Systems Inc. (CDNS) filed its 10-K annual report for the period ending December 27, 1996.

This filing provides a snapshot of the company's financial health and operational status as of that time. For investors, understanding the core business, revenue streams, and any significant financial disclosures is paramount. The report details Cadence's position within the electronic design automation (EDA) industry, a critical sector for semiconductor and electronics manufacturing.

As this is a historical filing from 1997, the context is crucial. Investors should consider this report as a look at the company's foundational period.

Key areas of interest would be its product offerings, market competitive landscape, and any stated strategies for growth or technological advancement at that point in time. While specific financial figures are not detailed in the provided snippet, the filing itself would contain comprehensive financial statements and management's discussion and analysis, which are vital for assessing performance and future prospects.

Key Highlights

  1. Filing date: March 20, 1997, for the fiscal year ending December 27, 1996.
  2. Company: Cadence Design Systems Inc. (CDNS).
  3. Industry: Electronic Design Automation (EDA) - a critical sector for the semiconductor industry.
  4. Purpose of Filing: Annual Report (10-K) providing a comprehensive overview of the company's financial and operational performance.
  5. Investor Focus: The report would contain crucial information regarding the company's business model, market position, and financial statements.
  6. Historical Context: This filing represents the company's status in the mid-1990s, offering insights into its early development and market entry.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary business of Cadence Design Systems Inc. as indicated by this 1997 filing?

    Based on the filing from 1997, Cadence Design Systems Inc. operates within the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) industry. This means the company likely provides software, hardware, and services that enable engineers to design and verify complex integrated circuits (ICs) and electronic systems.

  2. What kind of information can investors expect to find in this 1997 10-K filing?

    Investors can expect to find detailed financial statements (balance sheets, income statements, cash flow statements), a management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, information on the company's business, properties, legal proceedings, and risk factors. This report serves as a comprehensive annual review of the company's performance and position.

  3. Given the age of this filing (1997), what is its relevance to today's investors?

    This filing is primarily relevant for historical research, understanding the company's foundational period, and tracing its evolution. For current investors, it provides context on where Cadence Design Systems originated and its early strategic direction in the semiconductor design industry. It is not a direct indicator of current performance or future prospects, which would be assessed through recent filings.

  4. What are the key trends or challenges Cadence might have been facing in 1996, based on its industry?

    In 1996, the semiconductor industry was experiencing rapid growth and increasing complexity in chip design. Cadence, as an EDA provider, would likely have been focused on developing more advanced tools to handle these complexities, facing competition from other EDA vendors, and adapting to evolving semiconductor manufacturing technologies like shrinking process nodes and new architectures.